From: Richard Kenner <kenner@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 20:42:58 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: (expand_increment): If postincrement for MEM can't use add directly,
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0842a17931118249ec6743dfd1aabed36eb14605;p=gcc.git

(expand_increment): If postincrement for MEM can't use add directly,

load address in reg and enqueue increment and store of reg.

From-SVN: r12785
---

diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
index e0db90896b9..1b0ba5b98b8 100644
--- a/gcc/expr.c
+++ b/gcc/expr.c
@@ -9642,6 +9642,22 @@ expand_increment (exp, post, ignore)
 
 	  return enqueue_insn (op0, GEN_FCN (icode) (op0, op0, op1));
 	}
+      if (icode != (int) CODE_FOR_nothing && GET_CODE (op0) == MEM)
+	{
+	  rtx addr = force_reg (Pmode, XEXP (op0, 0));
+	  rtx temp, result;
+
+	  op0 = change_address (op0, VOIDmode, addr);
+	  temp = force_reg (GET_MODE (op0), op0);
+	  if (! (*insn_operand_predicate[icode][2]) (op1, mode))
+	    op1 = force_reg (mode, op1);
+
+	  /* The increment queue is LIFO, thus we have to `queue'
+	     the instructions in reverse order.  */
+	  enqueue_insn (op0, gen_move_insn (op0, temp));
+	  result = enqueue_insn (temp, GEN_FCN (icode) (temp, temp, op1));
+	  return result;
+	}
     }
 
   /* Preincrement, or we can't increment with one simple insn.  */