From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:56:11 +0000 (+0100) Subject: clarify X-Git-Tag: convert-csv-opcode-to-binary~5022 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0b9bca4518ba504d77af4b3eef6e6d082996550f;p=libreriscv.git clarify --- diff --git a/charter/discussion.mdwn b/charter/discussion.mdwn index e9b480bc1..af0864b20 100644 --- a/charter/discussion.mdwn +++ b/charter/discussion.mdwn @@ -78,12 +78,14 @@ will be ours. # Decision-making and new contributors This section has two aspects. The first is that everything but unanimous -decision-making is disempowering and de-motivating (harmful). Majority rule -(mob rule) is easily demonstrated to be so: anyone *not* in the majority -quickly gives up in resignation, even if their contribution is critically -important. Unanimous decision-making requires that the issue be discussed -until it is fully understood by *all* members (or members recognise that -they do not or cannot understand the issue, and abstain). +decision-making is disempowering and de-motivating (harmful). Majority +rule (mob rule) is easily demonstrated to be so: anyone *not* in the +majority quickly gives up in resignation, even if their contribution is +critically important (and in the political arena, "Minority Representative +Groups" form as a direct result). Unanimous decision-making requires +that the issue be discussed until it is fully understood by *all* members +(or members recognise that they do not or cannot understand the issue, +and abstain). The introduction of new contributors really requires specially spelling out. The last thing that is needed is for a new contributor to introduce