From: lkcl <lkcl@web>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:34:38 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: (no commit message)
X-Git-Tag: opf_rfc_ls005_v1~238
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=10b0aef5de3a15e4bddd025b82554e2a57bff61c;p=libreriscv.git

---

diff --git a/openpower/sv/svp64/discussion.mdwn b/openpower/sv/svp64/discussion.mdwn
index a57331cb4..6fa758480 100644
--- a/openpower/sv/svp64/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/openpower/sv/svp64/discussion.mdwn
@@ -212,13 +212,10 @@ full review needed, answering question:
 
 four aspects:
 
-1) instructions with only one source
-
-2) RM Modes
-
-3) is the loss of the dynamic meaning "VL=0" nop effect important?
-
-4) why would "sv.op all-scalar" be inside a loop in the first place?
+1. instructions with only one source
+2. RM Modes
+3. is the loss of the dynamic meaning "VL=0" nop effect important?
+4. why would "sv.op all-scalar" be inside a loop in the first place?
 
 ## answers to 2, RM Modes
 
@@ -238,11 +235,11 @@ fail-first with or without VLI, should be unaffected, but what should VL be trun
 
 saturation mode is fine
 
-predicate-result should be fine as well.
+predicate-result should be fine as well (aside from change in predicate behaviour)
 
 ## answers to 4, loops/uses
 
 **REMAP**
 
 A REMAP would redirect operations from the first nonmasked
-predicated element.
+predicated element to the first **REMAPped** element.