From: Geoffrey Keating Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 22:33:28 +0000 (+0000) Subject: name-lookup.c (struct scope_binding): New. X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=15f8ac7f0878178cca61636f81323629624e4585;p=gcc.git name-lookup.c (struct scope_binding): New. * name-lookup.c (struct scope_binding): New. (EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING): New. (lookup_using_namespace): Take a scope_binding instead of a cxx_binding. (qualified_lookup_using_namespace): Likewise. (cxx_binding_clear): Delete. (do_nonmember_using_decl): Use a scope_binding instead of a cxx_binding. (lookup_tag): Don't call select_decl. (ambiguous_decl): Don't return anything (and change callers to match). Take a scope_binding as the second parameter. (lookup_namespace_name): Use a scope_binding instead of a cxx_binding. (unqualified_namespace_lookup): Likewise. (lookup_qualified_name): Likewise. (select_decl): Take a scope_binding instead of a cxx_binding. Use macros rather than hand-coding tests for type-ness. From-SVN: r81864 --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index 25c72524de4..f1c24c1a36e 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,23 @@ +2004-05-14 Geoffrey Keating + + * name-lookup.c (struct scope_binding): New. + (EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING): New. + (lookup_using_namespace): Take a scope_binding instead of a + cxx_binding. + (qualified_lookup_using_namespace): Likewise. + (cxx_binding_clear): Delete. + (do_nonmember_using_decl): Use a scope_binding instead of a + cxx_binding. + (lookup_tag): Don't call select_decl. + (ambiguous_decl): Don't return anything (and change callers to match). + Take a scope_binding as the second parameter. + (lookup_namespace_name): Use a scope_binding instead of a + cxx_binding. + (unqualified_namespace_lookup): Likewise. + (lookup_qualified_name): Likewise. + (select_decl): Take a scope_binding instead of a cxx_binding. + Use macros rather than hand-coding tests for type-ness. + 2004-05-13 Diego Novillo * cp-gimplify.c: Rename from cp-simplify.c. diff --git a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c index 7b1ff39ca91..b3cc1dedc1b 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c +++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c @@ -32,14 +32,23 @@ Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ #include "diagnostic.h" #include "debug.h" +/* The bindings for a particular name in a particular scope. */ + +struct scope_binding { + tree value; + tree type; +}; +#define EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING { NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE } + static cxx_scope *innermost_nonclass_level (void); -static tree select_decl (cxx_binding *, int); +static tree select_decl (const struct scope_binding *, int); static cxx_binding *binding_for_name (cxx_scope *, tree); static tree lookup_name_current_level (tree); static tree push_overloaded_decl (tree, int); -static bool lookup_using_namespace (tree, cxx_binding *, tree, +static bool lookup_using_namespace (tree, struct scope_binding *, tree, tree, int); -static bool qualified_lookup_using_namespace (tree, tree, cxx_binding *, int); +static bool qualified_lookup_using_namespace (tree, tree, + struct scope_binding *, int); static tree lookup_type_current_level (tree); static tree push_using_directive (tree); static void cp_emit_debug_info_for_using (tree, tree); @@ -319,9 +328,6 @@ binding_table_foreach (binding_table table, bt_foreach_proc proc, void *data) static GTY((deletable)) cxx_binding *free_bindings; -/* Zero out a cxx_binding pointed to by B. */ -#define cxx_binding_clear(B) memset ((B), 0, sizeof (cxx_binding)) - /* (GC)-allocate a binding object with VALUE and TYPE member initialized. */ static cxx_binding * @@ -2116,10 +2122,9 @@ static void do_nonmember_using_decl (tree scope, tree name, tree oldval, tree oldtype, tree *newval, tree *newtype) { - cxx_binding decls; + struct scope_binding decls = EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING; *newval = *newtype = NULL_TREE; - cxx_binding_clear (&decls); if (!qualified_lookup_using_namespace (name, scope, &decls, 0)) /* Lookup error */ return; @@ -2362,23 +2367,24 @@ lookup_tag (enum tree_code form, tree name, { cxx_binding *binding = cxx_scope_find_binding_for_name (NAMESPACE_LEVEL (tail), name); - tree old; - - /* If we just skipped past a template parameter level, - even though THISLEVEL_ONLY, and we find a template - class declaration, then we use the _TYPE node for the - template. See the example below. */ - if (thislevel_only && !allow_template_parms_p - && binding && binding->value - && DECL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P (binding->value)) - old = binding->value; - else if (binding) - old = select_decl (binding, LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES); - else - old = NULL_TREE; - - if (old) + + if (binding && (binding->type + || (binding->value + && DECL_DECLARES_TYPE_P (binding->value)))) { + tree old; + + /* If we just skipped past a template parameter level, + even though THISLEVEL_ONLY, and we find a template + class declaration, then we use the _TYPE node for the + template. See the example below. */ + if (thislevel_only && !allow_template_parms_p + && binding->value + && DECL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P (binding->value)) + old = binding->value; + else + old = binding->type ? binding->type : binding->value; + /* We've found something at this binding level. If it is a typedef, extract the tag it refers to. Lookup fails if the typedef doesn't refer to a taggable type. */ @@ -3493,8 +3499,9 @@ merge_functions (tree s1, tree s2) XXX In what way should I treat extern declarations? XXX I don't want to repeat the entire duplicate_decls here */ -static cxx_binding * -ambiguous_decl (tree name, cxx_binding *old, cxx_binding *new, int flags) +static void +ambiguous_decl (tree name, struct scope_binding *old, cxx_binding *new, + int flags) { tree val, type; my_friendly_assert (old != NULL, 393); @@ -3568,7 +3575,6 @@ ambiguous_decl (tree name, cxx_binding *old, cxx_binding *new, int flags) error ("%J other type here", TYPE_MAIN_DECL (type)); } } - return old; } /* Return the declarations that are members of the namespace NS. */ @@ -3618,7 +3624,7 @@ lookup_namespace_name (tree namespace, tree name) { tree val; tree template_id = NULL_TREE; - cxx_binding binding; + struct scope_binding binding = EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING; timevar_push (TV_NAME_LOOKUP); my_friendly_assert (TREE_CODE (namespace) == NAMESPACE_DECL, 370); @@ -3648,7 +3654,6 @@ lookup_namespace_name (tree namespace, tree name) my_friendly_assert (TREE_CODE (name) == IDENTIFIER_NODE, 373); - cxx_binding_clear (&binding); if (!qualified_lookup_using_namespace (name, namespace, &binding, 0)) POP_TIMEVAR_AND_RETURN (TV_NAME_LOOKUP, error_mark_node); @@ -3695,7 +3700,7 @@ lookup_namespace_name (tree namespace, tree name) /* Select the right _DECL from multiple choices. */ static tree -select_decl (cxx_binding *binding, int flags) +select_decl (const struct scope_binding *binding, int flags) { tree val; val = binding->value; @@ -3714,9 +3719,8 @@ select_decl (cxx_binding *binding, int flags) if (binding->type && (!val || (flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES))) val = binding->type; /* Don't return non-types if we really prefer types. */ - else if (val && LOOKUP_TYPES_ONLY (flags) && TREE_CODE (val) != TYPE_DECL - && (TREE_CODE (val) != TEMPLATE_DECL - || !DECL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P (val))) + else if (val && LOOKUP_TYPES_ONLY (flags) + && ! DECL_DECLARES_TYPE_P (val)) val = NULL_TREE; POP_TIMEVAR_AND_RETURN (TV_NAME_LOOKUP, val); @@ -3733,10 +3737,9 @@ unqualified_namespace_lookup (tree name, int flags) tree siter; struct cp_binding_level *level; tree val = NULL_TREE; - cxx_binding binding; + struct scope_binding binding = EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING; timevar_push (TV_NAME_LOOKUP); - cxx_binding_clear (&binding); for (; !val; scope = CP_DECL_CONTEXT (scope)) { @@ -3800,9 +3803,8 @@ lookup_qualified_name (tree scope, tree name, bool is_type_p, bool complain) if (TREE_CODE (scope) == NAMESPACE_DECL) { - cxx_binding binding; + struct scope_binding binding = EMPTY_SCOPE_BINDING; - cxx_binding_clear (&binding); flags |= LOOKUP_COMPLAIN; if (is_type_p) flags |= LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES; @@ -3828,8 +3830,8 @@ lookup_qualified_name (tree scope, tree name, bool is_type_p, bool complain) Returns false on errors. */ static bool -lookup_using_namespace (tree name, cxx_binding *val, tree usings, tree scope, - int flags) +lookup_using_namespace (tree name, struct scope_binding *val, + tree usings, tree scope, int flags) { tree iter; timevar_push (TV_NAME_LOOKUP); @@ -3843,7 +3845,7 @@ lookup_using_namespace (tree name, cxx_binding *val, tree usings, tree scope, cxx_scope_find_binding_for_name (NAMESPACE_LEVEL (used), name); /* Resolve ambiguities. */ if (val1) - val = ambiguous_decl (name, val, val1, flags); + ambiguous_decl (name, val, val1, flags); } POP_TIMEVAR_AND_RETURN (TV_NAME_LOOKUP, val->value != error_mark_node); } @@ -3854,8 +3856,8 @@ lookup_using_namespace (tree name, cxx_binding *val, tree usings, tree scope, or false on error. */ static bool -qualified_lookup_using_namespace (tree name, tree scope, cxx_binding *result, - int flags) +qualified_lookup_using_namespace (tree name, tree scope, + struct scope_binding *result, int flags) { /* Maintain a list of namespaces visited... */ tree seen = NULL_TREE; @@ -3872,7 +3874,7 @@ qualified_lookup_using_namespace (tree name, tree scope, cxx_binding *result, cxx_scope_find_binding_for_name (NAMESPACE_LEVEL (scope), name); seen = tree_cons (scope, NULL_TREE, seen); if (binding) - result = ambiguous_decl (name, result, binding, flags); + ambiguous_decl (name, result, binding, flags); /* Consider strong using directives always, and non-strong ones if we haven't found a binding yet. ??? Shouldn't we consider