From: Eric Anholt Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:49:25 +0000 (-0800) Subject: v3d: Do uniform rematerialization spilling before dropping threadcount X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1e98f02d887dada530595bc0c74292d4678c5e1a;p=mesa.git v3d: Do uniform rematerialization spilling before dropping threadcount This feels like the right tradeoff for threads vs uniforms, particularly given that we often have very short thread segments right now: total instructions in shared programs: 6411504 -> 6413571 (0.03%) total threads in shared programs: 153946 -> 154214 (0.17%) total uniforms in shared programs: 2387665 -> 2393604 (0.25%) --- diff --git a/src/broadcom/compiler/vir_register_allocate.c b/src/broadcom/compiler/vir_register_allocate.c index ae71e502494..78f59f84744 100644 --- a/src/broadcom/compiler/vir_register_allocate.c +++ b/src/broadcom/compiler/vir_register_allocate.c @@ -586,16 +586,18 @@ v3d_register_allocate(struct v3d_compile *c, bool *spilled) bool ok = ra_allocate(g); if (!ok) { - /* Try to spill, if we can't reduce threading first. */ - if (thread_index == 0) { - int node = v3d_choose_spill_node(c, g, temp_to_node); + int node = v3d_choose_spill_node(c, g, temp_to_node); - if (node != -1) { - v3d_spill_reg(c, map[node].temp); + /* Don't emit spills using the TMU until we've dropped thread + * conut first. + */ + if (node != -1 && + (vir_is_mov_uniform(c, map[node].temp) || + thread_index == 0)) { + v3d_spill_reg(c, map[node].temp); - /* Ask the outer loop to call back in. */ - *spilled = true; - } + /* Ask the outer loop to call back in. */ + *spilled = true; } ralloc_free(g);