From: Lancelot SIX Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:09:11 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Remove unused parameter in maybe_software_singlestep X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=22b11ba924713e2d6d4879be5470a721f0dddf35;p=binutils-gdb.git Remove unused parameter in maybe_software_singlestep While working around, I noticed that the last parameter of maybe_software_singlestep is never used. This path removes it. Built on x86_64-linux-gnu and riscv64-linux-gnu. gdb/ChangeLog: * infrun.c (maybe_software_singlestep): Remove unused PC parameter. (resume_1): Update calls to maybe_software_singlestep. --- diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index 9469b74af39..8cfd58b267b 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_caller (struct frame_info *); static void insert_longjmp_resume_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *, CORE_ADDR); -static bool maybe_software_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc); +static bool maybe_software_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch); static void resume (gdb_signal sig); @@ -2048,14 +2048,13 @@ set_schedlock_func (const char *args, int from_tty, struct cmd_list_element *c) process. */ bool sched_multi = false; -/* Try to setup for software single stepping over the specified location. - Return true if target_resume() should use hardware single step. +/* Try to setup for software single stepping. Return true if target_resume() + should use hardware single step. - GDBARCH the current gdbarch. - PC the location to step over. */ + GDBARCH the current gdbarch. */ static bool -maybe_software_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc) +maybe_software_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) { bool hw_step = true; @@ -2390,7 +2389,7 @@ resume_1 (enum gdb_signal sig) set_step_over_info (regcache->aspace (), regcache_read_pc (regcache), 0, tp->global_num); - step = maybe_software_singlestep (gdbarch, pc); + step = maybe_software_singlestep (gdbarch); insert_breakpoints (); } @@ -2409,7 +2408,7 @@ resume_1 (enum gdb_signal sig) /* Do we need to do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints? */ else if (step) - step = maybe_software_singlestep (gdbarch, pc); + step = maybe_software_singlestep (gdbarch); /* Currently, our software single-step implementation leads to different results than hardware single-stepping in one situation: when stepping