From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:06:12 +0000 (-0600)
Subject: Mention process_stratum in inferior::priv comment
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2a3f442df9e9a71f9e3c4c5999a2c53bf93e488d;p=binutils-gdb.git

Mention process_stratum in inferior::priv comment

From what I can tell, inferior::priv is reserved for the
process_stratum target.  It seems to me that it has to be, because
currenlty only such targets use it, and if a target at another stratum
started using this field, then conflicts could occur.  This patch
documents this.

Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
---

diff --git a/gdb/inferior.h b/gdb/inferior.h
index 712f9b3f330..8f300a5bcc5 100644
--- a/gdb/inferior.h
+++ b/gdb/inferior.h
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ public:
      attach or handling a fork child.  */
   bool in_initial_library_scan = false;
 
-  /* Private data used by the target vector implementation.  */
+  /* Private data used by the process_stratum target.  */
   std::unique_ptr<private_inferior> priv;
 
   /* HAS_EXIT_CODE is true if the inferior exited with an exit code.