From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 22:49:25 +0000 (+1030)
Subject: Re: Usage of unitialized heap in tic4x_print_cond
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2c5b6e1a1c406cbe06e2d6f77861764ebd01b9ce;p=binutils-gdb.git

Re: Usage of unitialized heap in tic4x_print_cond

	PR 25319
	* tic4x-dis.c (tic4x_print_cond): Correct order of xcalloc args.
---

diff --git a/opcodes/ChangeLog b/opcodes/ChangeLog
index bde9b921666..5021447c18b 100644
--- a/opcodes/ChangeLog
+++ b/opcodes/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2019-12-30  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
+
+	PR 25319
+	* tic4x-dis.c (tic4x_print_cond): Correct order of xcalloc args.
+
 2019-12-29  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
 
 	* sparc-dis.c (SEX): Don't use left and right shift to sign extend.
diff --git a/opcodes/tic4x-dis.c b/opcodes/tic4x-dis.c
index 01cfa1e060f..e058fdc9f8a 100644
--- a/opcodes/tic4x-dis.c
+++ b/opcodes/tic4x-dis.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ tic4x_print_cond (struct disassemble_info *info, unsigned int cond)
 
   if (condtable == NULL)
     {
-      condtable = xcalloc (sizeof (tic4x_cond_t *), 32);
+      condtable = xcalloc (32, sizeof (tic4x_cond_t *));
       for (i = 0; i < tic4x_num_conds; i++)
 	condtable[tic4x_conds[i].cond] = (tic4x_cond_t *)(tic4x_conds + i);
     }