From: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:29:24 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: util: only allow _BitScanReverse64 on 64-bit cpus
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2f82d972ab982a816009228ff62bd5c5434062ca;p=mesa.git

util: only allow _BitScanReverse64 on 64-bit cpus

While the documentation for _BitScanReverse64 on MSDN says that it's
available on ARM, this isn't true. It's only available on ARM64. So
let's match reality.

Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
---

diff --git a/src/util/bitscan.c b/src/util/bitscan.c
index 7858291bf63..88d7f94e119 100644
--- a/src/util/bitscan.c
+++ b/src/util/bitscan.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ ffs(int i)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef HAVE___BUILTIN_FFSLL
-#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_M_AMD64 || _M_ARM || _M_IA64)
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_M_AMD64 || _M_ARM64 || _M_IA64)
 #else
 int
 ffsll(long long int val)
diff --git a/src/util/bitscan.h b/src/util/bitscan.h
index 02b3afda7f9..895a1e7a372 100644
--- a/src/util/bitscan.h
+++ b/src/util/bitscan.h
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ int ffs(int i);
 
 #ifdef HAVE___BUILTIN_FFSLL
 #define ffsll __builtin_ffsll
-#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_M_AMD64 || _M_ARM || _M_IA64)
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_M_AMD64 || _M_ARM64 || _M_IA64)
 static inline int
 ffsll(long long int i)
 {
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ util_last_bit64(uint64_t u)
 {
 #if defined(HAVE___BUILTIN_CLZLL)
    return u == 0 ? 0 : 64 - __builtin_clzll(u);
-#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_M_AMD64 || _M_ARM || _M_IA64)
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && (_M_AMD64 || _M_ARM64 || _M_IA64)
    unsigned long index;
    if (_BitScanReverse64(&index, u))
       return index + 1;