From: Francisco Jerez Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:08:56 +0000 (-0700) Subject: intel/fs/gen12: Fix interaction of SWSB dependency combination with EU fusion workaround. X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=36c155a0178d6f05d65a9acfe5b7553d7a522f07;p=mesa.git intel/fs/gen12: Fix interaction of SWSB dependency combination with EU fusion workaround. This has been reported to fix a hang in Shadow of Mordor on Gen12. One of its compute shaders seems to cause an in-order exec_all dependency to be merged into an out-of-order SET dependency slot, which would prevent us from baking the SET dependency into the parent instruction, leading to an assert failure in emit_inst_dependencies() (Thanks to Rafael for noticing that). Prevent that by avoiding combination of in-order dependencies whenever that would cause a SET dependency to be demoted to a SYNC.NOP instruction. Fixes: e14529ff3262a527 "intel/fs/gen12: Workaround data coherency issues due to broken NoMask control flow." Tested-by: Rafael Antognolli Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho --- diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_scoreboard.cpp b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_scoreboard.cpp index 5343aa1e634..cf619ffe3dc 100644 --- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_scoreboard.cpp +++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_scoreboard.cpp @@ -658,6 +658,16 @@ namespace { /* Try to combine the specified dependency with any existing ones. */ for (unsigned i = 0; i < deps.size(); i++) { + /* Don't combine otherwise matching dependencies if there is an + * exec_all mismatch which would cause a SET dependency to gain an + * exec_all flag, since that would prevent it from being baked + * into the instruction we want to allocate an SBID for. + */ + if (deps[i].exec_all != dep.exec_all && + (!deps[i].exec_all || (dep.unordered & TGL_SBID_SET)) && + (!dep.exec_all || (deps[i].unordered & TGL_SBID_SET))) + continue; + if (dep.ordered && deps[i].ordered) { deps[i].jp = MAX2(deps[i].jp, dep.jp); deps[i].ordered |= dep.ordered; @@ -665,16 +675,7 @@ namespace { dep.ordered = TGL_REGDIST_NULL; } - /* Don't combine otherwise matching unordered dependencies if - * there is an exec_all mismatch which would cause a SET - * dependency to gain an exec_all flag, since that would prevent - * it from being baked into the instruction we want to allocate an - * SBID for. - */ - if (dep.unordered && deps[i].unordered && deps[i].id == dep.id && - (deps[i].exec_all == dep.exec_all || - (deps[i].exec_all && !(dep.unordered & TGL_SBID_SET)) || - (dep.exec_all && !(deps[i].unordered & TGL_SBID_SET)))) { + if (dep.unordered && deps[i].unordered && deps[i].id == dep.id) { deps[i].unordered |= dep.unordered; deps[i].exec_all |= dep.exec_all; dep.unordered = TGL_SBID_NULL;