From: Rhys Perry Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:30:51 +0000 (+0100) Subject: aco: fix max_waves_per_simd on Polaris, VegaM and GFX10.3 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=37988b5b8ed05a7425d615d38dcc6243cf47036e;p=mesa.git aco: fix max_waves_per_simd on Polaris, VegaM and GFX10.3 fossil-db (Polaris): Totals from 20263 (14.75% of 137414) affected shaders: SGPRs: 871407 -> 871679 (+0.03%); split: -0.00%, +0.03% VGPRs: 513828 -> 550028 (+7.05%); split: -1.68%, +8.72% CodeSize: 18869680 -> 18828148 (-0.22%); split: -0.23%, +0.01% MaxWaves: 162012 -> 162030 (+0.01%); split: +0.01%, -0.00% Instrs: 3629172 -> 3618817 (-0.29%); split: -0.30%, +0.02% Cycles: 15682244 -> 15638244 (-0.28%); split: -0.30%, +0.02% VMEM: 10675942 -> 10673344 (-0.02%); split: +0.18%, -0.21% SMEM: 1209717 -> 1206088 (-0.30%); split: +0.03%, -0.33% VClause: 81780 -> 81227 (-0.68%); split: -0.73%, +0.06% SClause: 231724 -> 231561 (-0.07%); split: -0.07%, +0.00% Copies: 187126 -> 180831 (-3.36%); split: -3.62%, +0.26% Branches: 26841 -> 26837 (-0.01%); split: -0.03%, +0.01% Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann Part-of: --- diff --git a/src/amd/compiler/aco_live_var_analysis.cpp b/src/amd/compiler/aco_live_var_analysis.cpp index 0378dbaf335..08f2d68c80a 100644 --- a/src/amd/compiler/aco_live_var_analysis.cpp +++ b/src/amd/compiler/aco_live_var_analysis.cpp @@ -337,6 +337,8 @@ void update_vgpr_sgpr_demand(Program* program, const RegisterDemand new_demand) { /* TODO: max_waves_per_simd, simd_per_cu and the number of physical vgprs for Navi */ unsigned max_waves_per_simd = 10; + if ((program->family >= CHIP_POLARIS10 && program->family <= CHIP_VEGAM) || program->chip_class >= GFX10_3) + max_waves_per_simd = 8; unsigned simd_per_cu = 4; bool wgp = program->chip_class >= GFX10; /* assume WGP is used on Navi */ diff --git a/src/amd/compiler/aco_scheduler.cpp b/src/amd/compiler/aco_scheduler.cpp index 102f0bf3ee6..40941e4c539 100644 --- a/src/amd/compiler/aco_scheduler.cpp +++ b/src/amd/compiler/aco_scheduler.cpp @@ -882,6 +882,11 @@ void schedule_block(sched_ctx& ctx, Program *program, Block* block, live& live_v void schedule_program(Program *program, live& live_vars) { + /* don't use program->max_reg_demand because that is affected by max_waves_per_simd */ + RegisterDemand demand; + for (Block& block : program->blocks) + demand.update(block.register_demand); + sched_ctx ctx; ctx.mv.depends_on.resize(program->peekAllocationId()); ctx.mv.RAR_dependencies.resize(program->peekAllocationId()); @@ -891,15 +896,14 @@ void schedule_program(Program *program, live& live_vars) * seem to hurt anything else. */ if (program->num_waves <= 5) ctx.num_waves = program->num_waves; - else if (program->max_reg_demand.vgpr >= 32) + else if (demand.vgpr >= 29) ctx.num_waves = 5; - else if (program->max_reg_demand.vgpr >= 28) + else if (demand.vgpr >= 25) ctx.num_waves = 6; - else if (program->max_reg_demand.vgpr >= 24) - ctx.num_waves = 7; else - ctx.num_waves = 8; + ctx.num_waves = 7; ctx.num_waves = std::max(ctx.num_waves, program->min_waves); + ctx.num_waves = std::min(ctx.num_waves, program->max_waves); assert(ctx.num_waves > 0 && ctx.num_waves <= program->num_waves); ctx.mv.max_registers = { int16_t(get_addr_vgpr_from_waves(program, ctx.num_waves) - 2),