From: Kenneth Graunke Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:49:02 +0000 (-0800) Subject: iris: DEBUG=bat X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=50b1e01996f15e58806b92828ad676a155a991f7;p=mesa.git iris: DEBUG=bat Deleted in the interest of making the branch compile at each step --- diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/iris/iris_batch.c b/src/gallium/drivers/iris/iris_batch.c index 0354c4990d7..3edf593da66 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/iris/iris_batch.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/iris/iris_batch.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include "iris_batch.h" #include "iris_bufmgr.h" #include "iris_context.h" +#include "common/gen_decoder.h" #include "drm-uapi/i915_drm.h" @@ -48,6 +49,8 @@ #define BATCH_SZ (20 * 1024) #define STATE_SZ (18 * 1024) +static void decode_batch(struct iris_batch *batch); + static void iris_batch_reset(struct iris_batch *batch); @@ -326,13 +329,13 @@ grow_buffer(struct iris_batch *batch, * * Consider this scenario: * - * 1. Somebody calls brw_state_batch() to get a region of memory, and - * and then creates a brw_address pointing to brw->batch.state.bo. - * 2. They then call brw_state_batch() a second time, which happens to + * 1. Somebody calls iris_state_batch() to get a region of memory, and + * and then creates a iris_address pointing to iris->batch.state.bo. + * 2. They then call iris_state_batch() a second time, which happens to * grow and replace the state buffer. They then try to emit a * relocation to their first section of memory. * - * If we replace the brw->batch.state.bo pointer at step 2, we would + * If we replace the iris->batch.state.bo pointer at step 2, we would * break the address created in step 1. They'd have a pointer to the * old destroyed BO. Emitting a relocation would add this dead BO to * the validation list...causing /both/ statebuffers to be in the list, @@ -341,18 +344,18 @@ grow_buffer(struct iris_batch *batch, * This is not a contrived case - BLORP vertex data upload hits this. * * There are worse scenarios too. Fences for GL sync objects reference - * brw->batch.batch.bo. If we replaced the batch pointer when growing, + * iris->batch.batch.bo. If we replaced the batch pointer when growing, * we'd need to chase down every fence and update it to point to the * new BO. Otherwise, it would refer to a "batch" that never actually * gets submitted, and would fail to trigger. * * To work around both of these issues, we transmutate the buffers in - * place, making the existing struct brw_bo represent the new buffer, + * place, making the existing struct iris_bo represent the new buffer, * and "new_bo" represent the old BO. This is highly unusual, but it * seems like a necessary evil. * * We also defer the memcpy of the existing batch's contents. Callers - * may make multiple brw_state_batch calls, and retain pointers to the + * may make multiple iris_state_batch calls, and retain pointers to the * old BO's map. We'll perform the memcpy in finish_growing_bo() when * we finally submit the batch, at which point we've finished uploading * state, and nobody should have any old references anymore. @@ -567,12 +570,12 @@ _iris_batch_flush_fence(struct iris_batch *batch, if (ret < 0) return ret; - //throttle(brw); + //throttle(iris); - //if (unlikely(INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_BATCH)) - //do_batch_dump(brw); + if (unlikely(INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_BATCH)) + decode_batch(batch); - //if (brw->ctx.Const.ResetStrategy == GL_LOSE_CONTEXT_ON_RESET_ARB) + //if (iris->ctx.Const.ResetStrategy == GL_LOSE_CONTEXT_ON_RESET_ARB) //iris_check_for_reset(ice); if (unlikely(INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_SYNC)) { @@ -719,3 +722,9 @@ iris_emit_state(struct iris_batch *batch, memcpy(dest, data, size); return out_offset; } + +static void +decode_batch(struct iris_batch *batch) +{ + // XXX: decode the batch +}