From: Yehowshua Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:22:33 +0000 (+0100) Subject: grammatical X-Git-Tag: convert-csv-opcode-to-binary~2911 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5a0dde4e2639ed49e796d115b8a5184dc7b9a1cf;p=libreriscv.git grammatical --- diff --git a/why_a_libresoc.mdwn b/why_a_libresoc.mdwn index ce3e10aae..b3ccca678 100644 --- a/why_a_libresoc.mdwn +++ b/why_a_libresoc.mdwn @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ There are entire [dissertations](http://www.kroening.com/diss/diss-kroe.pdf) ded Given the fact that performant bug-free processors no longer exist [1][2], how can you trust your processor [3]? The next best thing is to have access to a processor’s design files. Not only have access to them, you must have the freedom to study, improve them, run the test suites and be able to improve those too. -Not only that, you and everyone who has a stake in the success needs to be entirely free from NDAs and other restrictions which prevent and prohibit communication. An example: although you yourself might not have the technical capability to review our SoC, you can always find a third party to pay who can. However if the source code was under NDA, do you think that would be practical to consider? +Not only that, you and everyone who has a stake in the success needs to be entirely free from NDAs and other restrictions which prevent and prohibit communication. An example: although you yourself might not have the technical capability to review our SoC, you can always find a third party to pay those who can. However if the source code was under NDA, do you think that would be practical to consider? *Collaboration, not competition*.