From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:55:06 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Add workaround for gcc-2.95.2 failure.
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=62043cea9be30a598a465fca88c46df26546ecda;p=binutils-gdb.git

Add workaround for gcc-2.95.2 failure.
---

diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog b/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 89f94ff3e70..c07f18eb48b 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 2000-04-12  Alan Modra  <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
 
+	* ld-selective/3.cc (_start): Add cheat for gcc-2.95.2 failure.
+
 	* ld-selective/selective.exp (test4): Test for presence of
 	foo__1B, not absence.  Also check for foo__1A and _start.
 	White space changes throughout file.
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc b/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc
index 852bc5d0454..79d5e96b7f1 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ struct A
 };
 
 void A::foo() { }			// keep
-void A::bar() { }			// loose
+void A::bar() { }			// lose
 
 struct B : public A
 {
@@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ A *getme() { return &a; }		// keep
 void _start()
 {
   getme()->foo();
+#ifdef __GNUC__
+#if (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 96)
+// gcc-2.95.2 gets this test wrong, and loses B::foo().
+// Cheat.  After all, we aren't trying to test the compiler here.
+  b.foo();
+#endif
+#endif
 }
 
 // In addition, keep A's virtual table.