From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:02:21 +0000 (-0300)
Subject: do not skip validation of switch after %<opt
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6232d02b4fce4c67d39815aa8fb956e4b10a4e1b;p=gcc.git

do not skip validation of switch after %<opt

After the patch that revamped dump and aux outputs, GCC compilation
drivers built without Ada would reject -d* options.  Such options
would only be validated because of the %{d*} in Ada lang specs, though
other languages had it as well.  Other languages had %< specs that had
to be there before %{d*} %:dumps(), while Ada was missing them.
Adding them to Ada brought the same problem to compilers that had Ada
enabled.

The reason validation failed was that they mishandled %< specs,
advancing past the beginning of the next spec, causing it not to be
handled.  Since %{d*} appeared after an odd %<, it was thus ignored.
The logic of validate_switches originally skipped the closing brace
that matched the opening brace, but this shouldn't happen for %<.
Fixed by letting validate_switches know whether it is handling a
braced group or a single atom, and behaving accordingly.


gcc/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.c (validate_switches): Add braced parameter.  Adjust all
	callers.  Expected and skip trailing brace only if braced.
	Return after handling one atom otherwise.
	(DUMPS_OPTIONS): New.
	(cpp_debug_options): Define in terms of it.

gcc/ada/ChangeLog:

	* gcc-interface/lang-specs.h (ADA_DUMPS_OPTIONS): Define in
	terms of DUMPS_OPTIONS.  Replace occurrences of %{d*} %:dumps
	with it.
---

diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/lang-specs.h b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/lang-specs.h
index 12b7cf5ef9a..f0ef3b92d0f 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/lang-specs.h
+++ b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/lang-specs.h
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
  *                                                                          *
  ****************************************************************************/
 
+/* Pass -d* flags to the actual compiler, but mapping non-Ada
+   extensions to .ada in dump file names.  */
+#define ADA_DUMPS_OPTIONS DUMPS_OPTIONS ("%{!.adb:%{!.ads:.ada}}")
+
 /* This is the contribution to the `default_compilers' array in gcc.c for
    GNAT.  */
 
@@ -35,7 +39,7 @@
  gnat1 %{I*} %{k8:-gnatk8} %{Wall:-gnatwa} %{w:-gnatws} %{!Q:-quiet}\
     %{nostdinc*} %{nostdlib*}\
     %{fcompare-debug-second:-gnatd_A} \
-    %{O*} %{W*} %{w} %{p} %{pg:-p} %{d*} %:dumps(%{!.adb:%{!.ads:.ada}}) \
+    %{O*} %{W*} %{w} %{p} %{pg:-p} " ADA_DUMPS_OPTIONS " \
     %{coverage:-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage} "
 #if defined(TARGET_VXWORKS_RTP)
    "%{fRTS=rtp|fRTS=rtp-smp|fRTS=ravenscar-cert-rtp:-mrtp} "
@@ -51,7 +55,7 @@
  %{!c:%e-c required for gnat2why}\
  gnat1why %{I*} %{k8:-gnatk8} %{!Q:-quiet}\
     %{nostdinc*} %{nostdlib*}\
-    %{a} %{d*} %:dumps(%{!.adb:%{!.ads:.ada}}) \
+    %{a} " ADA_DUMPS_OPTIONS " \
     %{gnatea:-gnatez} %{g*&m*&f*} \
     %1 %{o*:%w%*-gnatO} \
     %i \
@@ -62,7 +66,7 @@
  %{!c:%e-c required for gnat2scil}\
  gnat1scil %{I*} %{k8:-gnatk8} %{!Q:-quiet}\
     %{nostdinc*} %{nostdlib*}\
-    %{a} %{d*} %:dumps(%{!.adb:%{!.ads:.ada}}) \
+    %{a} " ADA_DUMPS_OPTIONS " \
     %{gnatea:-gnatez} %{g*&m*&f*} \
     %1 %{o*:%w%*-gnatO} \
     %i \
diff --git a/gcc/gcc.c b/gcc/gcc.c
index 8c851d79157..e2362175f40 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc.c
+++ b/gcc/gcc.c
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static void do_option_spec (const char *, const char *);
 static void do_self_spec (const char *);
 static const char *find_file (const char *);
 static int is_directory (const char *, bool);
-static const char *validate_switches (const char *, bool);
+static const char *validate_switches (const char *, bool, bool);
 static void validate_all_switches (void);
 static inline void validate_switches_from_spec (const char *, bool);
 static void give_switch (int, int);
@@ -1176,9 +1176,16 @@ static const char *cpp_options =
  %{!fno-working-directory:-fworking-directory}}} %{O*}\
  %{undef} %{save-temps*:-fpch-preprocess}";
 
+/* Pass -d* flags, possibly modifying -dumpdir, -dumpbase et al.
+
+   Make it easy for a language to override the argument for the
+   %:dumps specs function call.  */
+#define DUMPS_OPTIONS(EXTS) \
+  "%<dumpdir %<dumpbase %<dumpbase-ext %{d*} %:dumps(" EXTS ")"
+
 /* This contains cpp options which are not passed when the preprocessor
    output will be used by another program.  */
-static const char *cpp_debug_options = "%<dumpdir %<dumpbase %<dumpbase-ext %{d*} %:dumps()";
+static const char *cpp_debug_options = DUMPS_OPTIONS ("");
 
 /* NB: This is shared amongst all front-ends, except for Ada.  */
 static const char *cc1_options =
@@ -9061,7 +9068,7 @@ validate_switches_from_spec (const char *spec, bool user)
 	    || (*p == 'W' && *++p == '{')
 	    || (*p == '@' && *++p == '{')))
       /* We have a switch spec.  */
-      p = validate_switches (p + 1, user);
+      p = validate_switches (p + 1, user, *p == '{');
 }
 
 static void
@@ -9080,11 +9087,15 @@ validate_all_switches (void)
   validate_switches_from_spec (link_command_spec, false);
 }
 
-/* Look at the switch-name that comes after START
-   and mark as valid all supplied switches that match it.  */
+/* Look at the switch-name that comes after START and mark as valid
+   all supplied switches that match it.  If BRACED, handle other
+   switches after '|' and '&', and specs after ':' until ';' or '}',
+   going back for more switches after ';'.  Without BRACED, handle
+   only one atom.  Return a pointer to whatever follows the handled
+   items, after the closing brace if BRACED.  */
 
 static const char *
-validate_switches (const char *start, bool user_spec)
+validate_switches (const char *start, bool user_spec, bool braced)
 {
   const char *p = start;
   const char *atom;
@@ -9126,6 +9137,9 @@ next_member:
 	      switches[i].validated = true;
     }
 
+  if (!braced)
+    return p;
+
   if (*p) p++;
   if (*p && (p[-1] == '|' || p[-1] == '&'))
     goto next_member;
@@ -9138,11 +9152,11 @@ next_member:
 	    {
 	      p++;
 	      if (*p == '{' || *p == '<')
-		p = validate_switches (p+1, user_spec);
+		p = validate_switches (p+1, user_spec, *p == '{');
 	      else if (p[0] == 'W' && p[1] == '{')
-		p = validate_switches (p+2, user_spec);
+		p = validate_switches (p+2, user_spec, true);
 	      else if (p[0] == '@' && p[1] == '{')
-		p = validate_switches (p+2, user_spec);
+		p = validate_switches (p+2, user_spec, true);
 	    }
 	  else
 	    p++;