From: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:43:43 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: [arm] PR target/85026: Fix ldrsh length estimate in Thumb state
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=63028caaeb63f5a3fa1dcabaae10fe5902a39048;p=gcc.git

[arm] PR target/85026: Fix ldrsh length estimate in Thumb state

This bug has been reported against GCC 7.3.0 but it is latent in all release branches and on trunk.
We underestimate the length of the LRSH instruction in Thumb state.
Unlike other load instructions LDRSH can be encoded in 16 bits only when using a register offset.
In the testcase we have "ldrsh   r2, [r4]" being assigned a length of 2, which is wrong.
So we don't calculate branch ranges properly and cause the assembler error.

The fix is to make the unaligned_loadhis insn similar to the *arm_extendqihi_insn insn that outputs an LDRSB.
Just remove the wrong 2-byte alternative. I don't think this is worth inventing a new "register-offset-only" constraint.
This also makes the patch safer for backporting.

Bootstrapped and tested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.

	PR target/85026
	* config/arm/arm.md (unaligned_loadhis): Remove first alternative.
	Clean up attributes.

	* g++.dg/pr85026.C: New test.

From-SVN: r258818
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index e407bc7afc1..53b67fb832b 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2018-03-23  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
+
+	PR target/85026
+	* config/arm/arm.md (unaligned_loadhis): Remove first alternative.
+	Clean up attributes.
+
 2018-03-23  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
 
 	PR debug/85020
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
index c6229c2242c..2d5359e532f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
@@ -4460,16 +4460,13 @@
    (set_attr "type" "load_4")])
 
 (define_insn "unaligned_loadhis"
-  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=l,r")
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
 	(sign_extend:SI
-	  (unspec:HI [(match_operand:HI 1 "memory_operand" "Uw,Uh")]
+	  (unspec:HI [(match_operand:HI 1 "memory_operand" "Uh")]
 		     UNSPEC_UNALIGNED_LOAD)))]
   "unaligned_access"
   "ldrsh%?\t%0, %1\t@ unaligned"
-  [(set_attr "arch" "t2,any")
-   (set_attr "length" "2,4")
-   (set_attr "predicable" "yes")
-   (set_attr "predicable_short_it" "yes,no")
+  [(set_attr "predicable" "yes")
    (set_attr "type" "load_byte")])
 
 (define_insn "unaligned_loadhiu"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 939c8ffb9ac..e709ff18b48 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-03-23  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
+
+	PR target/85026
+	* g++.dg/pr85026.C: New test.
+
 2018-03-23  David Edelsohn  <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
 
 	* g++.dg/debug/pr84704.C: XFAIL AIX.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr85026.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr85026.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e1e3ccd2e35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr85026.C
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/* PR target/85026.  */
+/* { dg-do assemble } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=gnu++11" } */
+
+template <class> class a;
+class b;
+struct c {
+  typedef a<b> &g;
+};
+template <typename d> struct e { typedef typename d::f iter; };
+class h {
+public:
+  void __attribute__((noreturn)) i();
+} ab;
+template <class> class a {
+public:
+  typedef b *f;
+  b &operator[](unsigned m) {
+    if (ac)
+      ab.i();
+    return ad[m];
+  }
+  f n() { return ad; }
+  f m_fn3();
+  b *ad;
+  unsigned ac;
+};
+class b {
+public:
+  short j;
+  short k;
+  signed l;
+} __attribute__((__packed__));
+void o(a<b> &m, b &p2, b &p) {
+  p2 = p = m[0];
+  if (bool at = false)
+    ;
+  else
+    for (c::g au(m);; at = true)
+      if (bool av = false)
+        ;
+      else
+        for (e<a<int>>::iter aw = au.n(), ax = au.m_fn3(); ax;
+             av ? (void)0 : (void)0)
+          if (bool ay = 0)
+            ;
+          else
+            for (b az = *aw; !ay; ay = true) {
+              if (p2.j)
+                p2.j = az.j;
+              else if (p.j)
+                p.j = az.j;
+              if (p2.k)
+                p2.k = az.k;
+              else if (az.k > p.k)
+                p.k = az.k;
+              if (az.l < p2.l)
+                if (az.l > p.l)
+                  p.l = az.l;
+            }
+}