From: Connor Abbott Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:54:26 +0000 (-0700) Subject: nir/cf: handle jumps better in stitch_blocks() X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=633cbbc0682b1cec3107398a21a057697e8572aa;p=mesa.git nir/cf: handle jumps better in stitch_blocks() In particular, handle the case where the earlier block ends in a jump and the later block is empty. In that case, we want to preserve the jump and remove any traces of the later block. Before, we would only hit this case when removing a control flow node after a jump, which wasn't a common occurance, but we'll need it to handle inserting a control flow list which ends in a jump, which should be more common/useful. Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke --- diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c b/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c index 1f2a681f258..8a4a0bf5f9d 100644 --- a/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c +++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c @@ -706,14 +706,24 @@ stitch_blocks(nir_block *before, nir_block *after) * TODO: special case when before is empty and after isn't? */ - move_successors(after, before); + if (block_ends_in_jump(before)) { + assert(exec_list_is_empty(&after->instr_list)); + if (after->successors[0]) + remove_phi_src(after->successors[0], after); + if (after->successors[1]) + remove_phi_src(after->successors[1], after); + unlink_block_successors(after); + exec_node_remove(&after->cf_node.node); + } else { + move_successors(after, before); - foreach_list_typed(nir_instr, instr, node, &after->instr_list) { - instr->block = before; - } + foreach_list_typed(nir_instr, instr, node, &after->instr_list) { + instr->block = before; + } - exec_list_append(&before->instr_list, &after->instr_list); - exec_node_remove(&after->cf_node.node); + exec_list_append(&before->instr_list, &after->instr_list); + exec_node_remove(&after->cf_node.node); + } }