From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 22:24:42 +0000 (+0100) Subject: package/Config.in: explain that lua package names should start with lua X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=687a313179b07865a12e9a35bc4c506fb371d2d0;p=buildroot.git package/Config.in: explain that lua package names should start with lua We have decided that lua packages should have a name that starts with lua (like is the case for python and perl). However, we're not going to rename all the existing lua packages that don't start with lua. This makes it unclear for people adding packages how they should name the package, so add a comment to package/Config.in to explain it. It's rather terse but it gets the message across. Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in index 78acc53718..cfe7fc608f 100644 --- a/package/Config.in +++ b/package/Config.in @@ -525,6 +525,10 @@ endif if BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LUAINTERPRETER && !BR2_STATIC_LIBS # lua modules are dynamically loaded, so not available on static builds menu "Lua libraries/modules" +# When adding lua packages, make sure the name start with "lua". If the +# upstream package is "luafoo", call it "luafoo" in Buildroot; if the upstream +# package is "foo", call it "lua-foo". Many packages currently don't follow +# this convention, but that's historical accident. source "package/argparse/Config.in" source "package/cgilua/Config.in" source "package/copas/Config.in"