From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 10:42:02 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Doc weak symbol problem.
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6bc37a96565d83ad7de837db6d35542ff4795fd0;p=binutils-gdb.git

Doc weak symbol problem.
---

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 00baf73141d..49c7210e814 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Fri May 12 20:38:55 2000  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
+
+	* TODO: Mention weak symbol problem.
+
 Fri May 12 14:12:17 2000  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
 
 	* README: Update section on kernel debugging.
diff --git a/gdb/TODO b/gdb/TODO
index b1e0648770d..61840c8a3f3 100644
--- a/gdb/TODO
+++ b/gdb/TODO
@@ -169,6 +169,17 @@ David Whedon writes:
 > gdb/rdi-share/unixcomm.c.  SERPORT1 et. al. never get defined because we
 > aren't one of the architectures supported.
 
+--
+
+Problem with weak functions
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-05/msg00060.html
+
+Dan Nicolaescu writes:
+> It seems that gdb-4.95.1  does not display correctly the function when
+> stoping in weak functions. 
+> 
+> It stops in a function that is defined as weak, not in the function
+> that is actualy run... 
 
 --