From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:23:38 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: doc: mention handling of {0} in -Wmissing-field-initializers (PR 71250)
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7041308f607f80a2d5c00d01e7e7c907722f86e7;p=gcc.git

doc: mention handling of {0} in -Wmissing-field-initializers (PR 71250)

	PR other/71250
	* doc/invoke.texi (-Wmissing-field-initializers): Mention that warning
	is suppressed for '{ 0 }' in C.

From-SVN: r247018
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 5ded09b27fd..c908048f21b 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2017-04-20  Alexander Monakov  <amonakov@ispras.ru>
+
+	PR other/71250
+	* doc/invoke.texi (-Wmissing-field-initializers): Mention that warning
+	is suppressed for '{ 0 }' in C.
+
 2017-04-20  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
 
 	* BASE-VER: Set to 8.0.0.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 19a85b6cd9a..5ee13b8984a 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -6220,7 +6220,15 @@ struct s @{ int f, g, h; @};
 struct s x = @{ .f = 3, .g = 4 @};
 @end smallexample
 
-In C++ this option does not warn either about the empty @{ @}
+In C this option does not warn about the universal zero initializer
+@samp{@{ 0 @}}:
+
+@smallexample
+struct s @{ int f, g, h; @};
+struct s x = @{ 0 @};
+@end smallexample
+
+Likewise, in C++ this option does not warn about the empty @{ @}
 initializer, for example:
 
 @smallexample