From: Simon Marchi Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:14:38 +0000 (-0400) Subject: gdb: optimize selection of resumed thread with pending event X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=71a2349005e74e0d64554f5c88e3632f3ace167a;p=binutils-gdb.git gdb: optimize selection of resumed thread with pending event Consider a case where many threads (thousands) keep hitting a breakpoint whose condition evaluates to false. random_pending_event_thread is responsible for selecting a thread from an inferior among all that are resumed with a pending wait status. It is currently implemented by walking the inferior's thread list twice: once to count the number of candidates and once to select a random one. Since we now maintain a per target list of resumed threads with pending event, we can implement this more efficiently by walking that list and selecting the first thread that matches the criteria (random_pending_event_thread looks for an thread from a specific inferior, and possibly a filter ptid). It will be faster especially in the common case where there isn't any resumed thread with pending event. Currently, we have to iterate the thread list to figure this out. With this patch, the list of resumed threads with pending event will be empty, so it's quick to figure out. The random selection is kept, but is moved to process_stratum_target::random_resumed_with_pending_wait_status. The same technique is used: do a first pass to count the number of candidates, and do a second pass to select a random one. But given that the list of resumed threads with pending wait statuses will generally be short, or at least shorter than the full thread list, it should be quicker. Note that this isn't completely true, in case there are multiple inferiors on the same target. Imagine that inferior A has 10k resumed threads with pending wait statuses, and random_pending_event_thread is called with inferior B. We'll need to go through the list that contains inferior A's threads to realize that inferior B has no resumed threads with pending wait status. But I think that this is a corner / pathological case. And a possible fix for this situation would be to make random_pending_event_thread work per-process-target, rather than per-inferior. Change-Id: I1b71d01beaa500a148b5b9797745103e13917325 --- diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index bec8e83e193..93cb55e70c7 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -3492,39 +3492,21 @@ print_target_wait_results (ptid_t waiton_ptid, ptid_t result_ptid, static struct thread_info * random_pending_event_thread (inferior *inf, ptid_t waiton_ptid) { - int num_events = 0; + process_stratum_target *proc_target = inf->process_target (); + thread_info *thread + = proc_target->random_resumed_with_pending_wait_status (inf, waiton_ptid); - auto has_event = [&] (thread_info *tp) + if (thread == nullptr) { - return (tp->ptid.matches (waiton_ptid) - && tp->resumed () - && tp->has_pending_waitstatus ()); - }; - - /* First see how many events we have. Count only resumed threads - that have an event pending. */ - for (thread_info *tp : inf->non_exited_threads ()) - if (has_event (tp)) - num_events++; - - if (num_events == 0) - return NULL; - - /* Now randomly pick a thread out of those that have had events. */ - int random_selector = (int) ((num_events * (double) rand ()) - / (RAND_MAX + 1.0)); - - if (num_events > 1) - infrun_debug_printf ("Found %d events, selecting #%d", - num_events, random_selector); + infrun_debug_printf ("None found."); + return nullptr; + } - /* Select the Nth thread that has had an event. */ - for (thread_info *tp : inf->non_exited_threads ()) - if (has_event (tp)) - if (random_selector-- == 0) - return tp; + infrun_debug_printf ("Found %s.", target_pid_to_str (thread->ptid).c_str ()); + gdb_assert (thread->resumed ()); + gdb_assert (thread->has_pending_waitstatus ()); - gdb_assert_not_reached ("event thread not found"); + return thread; } /* Wrapper for target_wait that first checks whether threads have diff --git a/gdb/process-stratum-target.c b/gdb/process-stratum-target.c index 2cb6dfc251a..7aeda79e04c 100644 --- a/gdb/process-stratum-target.c +++ b/gdb/process-stratum-target.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include "defs.h" #include "process-stratum-target.h" #include "inferior.h" +#include process_stratum_target::~process_stratum_target () { @@ -140,6 +141,48 @@ process_stratum_target::maybe_remove_resumed_with_pending_wait_status /* See process-stratum-target.h. */ +thread_info * +process_stratum_target::random_resumed_with_pending_wait_status + (inferior *inf, ptid_t filter_ptid) +{ + auto matches = [inf, filter_ptid] (const thread_info &thread) + { + return thread.inf == inf && thread.ptid.matches (filter_ptid); + }; + + /* First see how many matching events we have. */ + const auto &l = m_resumed_with_pending_wait_status; + unsigned int count = std::count_if (l.begin (), l.end (), matches); + + if (count == 0) + return nullptr; + + /* Now randomly pick a thread out of those that match the criteria. */ + int random_selector + = (int) ((count * (double) rand ()) / (RAND_MAX + 1.0)); + + if (count > 1) + infrun_debug_printf ("Found %u events, selecting #%d", + count, random_selector); + + /* Select the Nth thread that matches. */ + auto it = std::find_if (l.begin (), l.end (), + [&random_selector, &matches] + (const thread_info &thread) + { + if (!matches (thread)) + return false; + + return random_selector-- == 0; + }); + + gdb_assert (it != l.end ()); + + return &*it; +} + +/* See process-stratum-target.h. */ + std::set all_non_exited_process_targets () { diff --git a/gdb/process-stratum-target.h b/gdb/process-stratum-target.h index 6bd8bc37b5e..ed6907c2bd1 100644 --- a/gdb/process-stratum-target.h +++ b/gdb/process-stratum-target.h @@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ public: bool has_resumed_with_pending_wait_status () const { return !m_resumed_with_pending_wait_status.empty (); } + /* Return a random resumed thread with pending wait status belonging to INF + and matching FILTER_PTID. */ + thread_info *random_resumed_with_pending_wait_status + (inferior *inf, ptid_t filter_ptid); + /* The connection number. Visible in "info connections". */ int connection_number = 0;