From: Mark Wielaard Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 14:21:08 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Add DWARF5 variants of assembly scan tests that use DW_FORM_implicit_const X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=71e3d1970c00a74be16c0f5a3fcaced359077135;p=gcc.git Add DWARF5 variants of assembly scan tests that use DW_FORM_implicit_const Some DWARF tests scan the assembly output looking for constant values. When using DWARF5 those constants might use DW_FORM_implicit_const, which are output (in the comments) after the attribute instead of before. To make sure these tests work introduce a -gdwarf-5 variant of these tests and explicitly use -gdwarf-2 for the original. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c: Add -gdwarf-2. * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C: Likewise. * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline6.c: New variant with -gdwarf-5. * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-3.C: Likewise. * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-7.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-8.c: Likewise. --- diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C index 3b1c913edfc..9a88e28cbe0 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } } -// { dg-options "-O -g -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" } +// { dg-options "-O -gdwarf-2 -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" } // { dg-require-weak "" } // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x1\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 2 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-3.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..52ed5b6912f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-3.C @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +// DWARF5 variant of inline-var-1.C +// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } } +// { dg-options "-O -gdwarf-5 -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" } +// { dg-require-weak "" } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_inline \\(0x3\\)" 2 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 4 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x1\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 2 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_declaration" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_specification" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_\[^\n\r]*linkage_name" 7 { xfail *-*-aix* } } } + +inline int a; +struct S +{ + static inline double b = 4.0; + static constexpr int c = 2; + static constexpr inline char d = 3; +} s; +template +inline int e = N; +int &f = e<2>; +template +struct T +{ + static inline double g = 4.0; + static constexpr int h = 2; + static inline constexpr char i = 3; +}; +T<5> t; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c index 7e019a6c06a..9c36450ae2d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ properly nested DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine DIEs for third, second and first. */ -/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */ +/* Explicitly use dwarf-2 because dwarf-5 might use DW_FORM_implicit_const + which is hard to scan for. */ +/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf-2 -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* There are 6 inlined subroutines: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline6.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03013f11bca --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline6.c @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +/* DWARF5 variant of inline2. + Origin: PR debug/37801 + + Abstract instances (DW_TAG_subroutines having the DW_AT_inline attribute) + of second and first were having a DW_TAG_lexical_block DIE wrongly + representing the inlined calls to third (in second) and to + second (in first). At the same time, main didn't have children + DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine DIEs representing the inlined calls to + first, second and third. + + The ideal goal here is to test that we have no superfluous + DW_TAG_lexical_block DIE anymore, that abstract instances DIEs have + no descendant DIE with a DW_AT_abstract_origin attribute, and that main has + properly nested DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine DIEs for third, second and first. +*/ + +/* Explicitly use dwarf-5 which uses DW_FORM_implicit_const. */ +/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf-5 -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ + +/* There are 6 inlined subroutines: + - One for each subroutine inlined into main, that's 3. + - One for earch subroutine inline into the out of line instances + of third, second and first. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\) DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine" 6 } } */ + +/* We should have no DW_TAG_lexical_block DIEs, all inline instances + should have the first subblock elided to match the abstract instance + layout. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block" 0 } } */ + + +/* There are 3 DW_AT_inline attributes: one per abstract inline instance. + The value of the attribute must be 0x3, meaning the function was + actually inlined. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_inline \\(0x3\\)" 3 } } */ + +volatile int *a; + +inline void +third (int arg3) +{ + int var3 = arg3; + a[0] = var3; +} + +inline void +second (int arg2) +{ + int var2 = arg2; + third (var2+1); +} + +inline void +first (int arg1) +{ + int var1 = arg1; + second (var1+1); +} + +int +main () +{ + int some_int = 1; + first (some_int); + return 0; +} + + diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c index d646f5983b3..80300ec22e8 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ /* Test that token after multi-line function-like macro use gets correct locus even when preprocessing separately. */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */ +/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf-2 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */ #define A(x) vari x #define vari(x) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c index 340cb383530..fbf033758b6 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* PR preprocessor/41445 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-gdwarf -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */ +/* { dg-options "-gdwarf-2 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */ #include "pr41445-5.c" diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-7.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e0de822d80 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-7.c @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* PR preprocessor/41445 DWARF5 variant */ +/* Test that token after multi-line function-like macro use + gets correct locus even when preprocessing separately. */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf-5 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */ + +#define A(x) vari x +#define vari(x) +#define B , varj +int A(B) ; + +/* We want to check that both vari and varj have the same line + number. */ + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"vari\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"varj\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-8.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a6eeb53096 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-8.c @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +/* PR preprocessor/41445 DWARF5 variant*/ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-gdwarf-5 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */ + +#include "pr41445-5.c" + +/* We want to check that both vari and varj have the same line + number. */ + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"vari\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"varj\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */