From: Ed Schonberg Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:42:25 +0000 (+0100) Subject: sem_ch7.adb (Install_Parent_Private_Declarations): If the private declarations of... X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7d823354f4372fc03b630275587b4873b9fef031;p=gcc.git sem_ch7.adb (Install_Parent_Private_Declarations): If the private declarations of a parent unit are made visible when... 2008-03-26 Ed Schonberg * sem_ch7.adb (Install_Parent_Private_Declarations): If the private declarations of a parent unit are made visible when compiling a child instance, the parent is not a hidden open scope, even though it may contain other pending instance. * sem_ch8.adb (Restore_Scope_Stack): If an entry on the stack is a hidden open scope for some child instance, it does affect the visibility status of other stach entries. (Analyze_Object_Renaming): Check that a class-wide object cannot be renamed as an object of a specific type. From-SVN: r133578 --- diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch7.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch7.adb index 11f24ce3c6c..2e95a1f5f43 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch7.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch7.adb @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ -- -- -- B o d y -- -- -- --- Copyright (C) 1992-2007, Free Software Foundation, Inc. -- +-- Copyright (C) 1992-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc. -- -- -- -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under -- -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- -- @@ -939,6 +939,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch7 is Inst_Par := Inst_Id; Gen_Par := Generic_Parent (Specification (Unit_Declaration_Node (Inst_Par))); + while Present (Gen_Par) and then Is_Child_Unit (Gen_Par) loop Inst_Node := Get_Package_Instantiation_Node (Inst_Par); @@ -963,11 +964,18 @@ package body Sem_Ch7 is -- happens when a generic child is instantiated, and the -- instance is a child of the parent instance. - -- Installing the use clauses of the parent instance twice is - -- both unnecessary and wrong, because it would cause the - -- clauses to be chained to themselves in the use clauses list - -- of the scope stack entry. That in turn would cause - -- End_Use_Clauses to get into an endless look upon scope exit. + -- Installing the use clauses of the parent instance twice + -- is both unnecessary and wrong, because it would cause the + -- clauses to be chained to themselves in the use clauses + -- list of the scope stack entry. That in turn would cause + -- an endless loop from End_Use_Clauses upon sccope exit. + + -- The parent is now fully visible. It may be a hidden open + -- scope if we are currently compiling some child instance + -- declared within it, but while the current instance is being + -- compiled the parent is immediately visible. In particular + -- its entities must remain visible if a stack save/restore + -- takes place through a call to Rtsfind. if Present (Gen_Par) then if not In_Private_Part (Inst_Par) then @@ -975,6 +983,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch7 is Set_Use (Private_Declarations (Specification (Unit_Declaration_Node (Inst_Par)))); + Set_Is_Hidden_Open_Scope (Inst_Par, False); end if; -- If we've reached the end of the generic instance parents, diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb index 609f5575320..b732d507ab9 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ -- -- -- B o d y -- -- -- --- Copyright (C) 1992-2007, Free Software Foundation, Inc. -- +-- Copyright (C) 1992-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc. -- -- -- -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under -- -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- -- @@ -747,6 +747,19 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is Resolve (Nam, T); + -- Check that a class-wide object is not being renamed as an object + -- of a specific type. The test for access types is needed to exclude + -- cases where the renamed object is a dynamically tagged access + -- result, such as occurs in certain expansions. + + if (Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Nam)) + or else (Is_Dynamically_Tagged (Nam) + and then not Is_Access_Type (T))) + and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (T) + then + Error_Msg_N ("dynamically tagged expression not allowed!", Nam); + end if; + -- Ada 2005 (AI-230/AI-254): Access renaming else pragma Assert (Present (Access_Definition (N))); @@ -1046,7 +1059,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is Generate_Reference (Old_P, Name (N)); -- If the renaming is in the visible part of a package, then we set - -- In_Package_Spec for the renamed package, to prevent giving + -- Renamed_In_Spec for the renamed package, to prevent giving -- warnings about no entities referenced. Such a warning would be -- overenthusiastic, since clients can see entities in the renamed -- package via the visible package renaming. @@ -6583,6 +6596,13 @@ package body Sem_Ch8 is then Full_Vis := True; + -- if S is the scope of some instance (which has already been + -- seen on the stack) it does not affect the visibility of + -- other scopes. + + elsif Is_Hidden_Open_Scope (S) then + null; + elsif (Ekind (S) = E_Procedure or else Ekind (S) = E_Function) and then Has_Completion (S)