From: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:03:29 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: i965/fs: Don't force MASK_DISABLE on INDIRECT_MOV instructions
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e08a13009d53d40f7917b5737159a9c45544458;p=mesa.git

i965/fs: Don't force MASK_DISABLE on INDIRECT_MOV instructions

It should work fine without it and the visitor can set it if it wants.

Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
---

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp
index c883fe3f259..35400cbe8c3 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp
@@ -366,7 +366,6 @@ fs_generator::generate_mov_indirect(fs_inst *inst,
    assert(inst->exec_size == 8 || devinfo->gen >= 8);
 
    brw_MOV(p, addr, indirect_byte_offset);
-   brw_inst_set_mask_control(devinfo, brw_last_inst, BRW_MASK_DISABLE);
    brw_MOV(p, dst, retype(brw_VxH_indirect(0, imm_byte_offset), dst.type));
 }