From: Brian Paul Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:48:34 +0000 (-0700) Subject: util: replace format equality test with compatibility test in blit code X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7f9692b97dab498ad47f82394892455d43dcd08b;p=mesa.git util: replace format equality test with compatibility test in blit code This lets us use the resource_copy_region() path when blitting from R8G8B8A8 to R8G8B8x8, for example. v2: be smarter when src_format==dst_format Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Reviewed-by: José Fonseca --- diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_blit.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_blit.c index a10fd17cbff..1279733881a 100644 --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_blit.c +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_blit.c @@ -320,6 +320,26 @@ regions_overlap(int srcX0, int srcY0, } +/** + * Can we blit from src format to dest format with a simple copy? + */ +static boolean +formats_compatible(enum pipe_format src_format, + enum pipe_format dst_format) +{ + if (src_format == dst_format) { + return TRUE; + } + else { + const struct util_format_description *src_desc = + util_format_description(src_format); + const struct util_format_description *dst_desc = + util_format_description(dst_format); + return util_is_format_compatible(src_desc, dst_desc); + } +} + + /** * Copy pixel block from src surface to dst surface. * Overlapping regions are acceptable. @@ -377,7 +397,7 @@ util_blit_pixels_writemask(struct blit_state *ctx, * no overlapping. * Filter mode should not matter since there's no stretching. */ - if (dst_format == src_format && + if (formats_compatible(src_format, dst_format) && srcX0 < srcX1 && dstX0 < dstX1 && srcY0 < srcY1 &&