From: Vicente Olivert Riera Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:03:15 +0000 (+0000) Subject: qt5base: fix compilation error with gcc-4.8 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=80fbef58533ad6b3ea7e24dbd1a7f165e9177e9d;p=buildroot.git qt5base: fix compilation error with gcc-4.8 Add a patch to fix a compilation error when using gcc-4.8. Bug report: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-59399 Patch sent upstream: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/187980/ Fixes: http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/2ac/2ac16335d16cd53cceeabda8f963c9b288a9a1c8/ Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- diff --git a/package/qt5/qt5base/5.8.0/0003-QAtomic-pass-explicit-failure-mode-to-std-atomic-com.patch b/package/qt5/qt5base/5.8.0/0003-QAtomic-pass-explicit-failure-mode-to-std-atomic-com.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3a43584eeb --- /dev/null +++ b/package/qt5/qt5base/5.8.0/0003-QAtomic-pass-explicit-failure-mode-to-std-atomic-com.patch @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +From c5d7425f8ad391112758db161e3e08f18dc9d299 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Marc Mutz +Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:30:26 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] QAtomic: pass explicit failure mode to + std::atomic::compare_exchange_strong + +... in an attempt to avoid GCC 4.8 errors such as + + bits/atomic_base.h:577:70: error: failure memory model cannot be stronger than success memory model for '__atomic_compare_exchange' + return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 0, __m1, __m2); + ^ + +as seen on Android. + +Change-Id: If046e735888cf331d2d6506d8d5ca9aa7402f9ad +[Bug report: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-59399 + Patch sent upstream: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/187980/] +Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera +--- + src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h | 8 ++++---- + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h b/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h +index bb49aae..d6731ec 100644 +--- a/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h ++++ b/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h +@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ template struct QAtomicOps + template + static bool testAndSetRelaxed(std::atomic &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW + { +- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_relaxed); ++ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_relaxed, std::memory_order_relaxed); + if (currentValue) + *currentValue = expectedValue; + return tmp; +@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ template struct QAtomicOps + template + static bool testAndSetAcquire(std::atomic &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW + { +- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acquire); ++ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acquire, std::memory_order_acquire); + if (currentValue) + *currentValue = expectedValue; + return tmp; +@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ template struct QAtomicOps + template + static bool testAndSetRelease(std::atomic &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW + { +- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_release); ++ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_release, std::memory_order_relaxed); + if (currentValue) + *currentValue = expectedValue; + return tmp; +@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ template struct QAtomicOps + template + static bool testAndSetOrdered(std::atomic &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW + { +- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acq_rel); ++ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acq_rel, std::memory_order_acquire); + if (currentValue) + *currentValue = expectedValue; + return tmp; +-- +1.7.10.4 +