From: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:45:53 +0000 (-0700) Subject: spirv: Generalize OpSelect X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=81586e9f534eb531d137ce6dce38265548227b0b;p=mesa.git spirv: Generalize OpSelect SPIR-V 1.4 supports OpSelect over any composite type, and also allows scalar boolean condition for vector types -- a case which we already handled to support old GLSLang. Added a helper function to recursively perform nir_bcsel, that makes easier to support structs. v2: Replace asserts() with vtn_fail_if(). (Jason) v3: Simplify Condition and Result types verifications. (Jason) Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand --- diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c b/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c index 8032a7b79c6..8efe0fa285c 100644 --- a/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c +++ b/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c @@ -4084,6 +4084,28 @@ vtn_handle_variable_or_type_instruction(struct vtn_builder *b, SpvOp opcode, return true; } +static struct vtn_ssa_value * +vtn_nir_select(struct vtn_builder *b, struct vtn_ssa_value *src0, + struct vtn_ssa_value *src1, struct vtn_ssa_value *src2) +{ + struct vtn_ssa_value *dest = rzalloc(b, struct vtn_ssa_value); + dest->type = src1->type; + + if (glsl_type_is_vector_or_scalar(src1->type)) { + dest->def = nir_bcsel(&b->nb, src0->def, src1->def, src2->def); + } else { + unsigned elems = glsl_get_length(src1->type); + + dest->elems = ralloc_array(b, struct vtn_ssa_value *, elems); + for (unsigned i = 0; i < elems; i++) { + dest->elems[i] = vtn_nir_select(b, src0, + src1->elems[i], src2->elems[i]); + } + } + + return dest; +} + static void vtn_handle_select(struct vtn_builder *b, SpvOp opcode, const uint32_t *w, unsigned count) @@ -4092,59 +4114,47 @@ vtn_handle_select(struct vtn_builder *b, SpvOp opcode, * pointers and not just regular vectors and scalars. */ struct vtn_value *res_val = vtn_untyped_value(b, w[2]); - struct vtn_value *sel_val = vtn_untyped_value(b, w[3]); + struct vtn_value *cond_val = vtn_untyped_value(b, w[3]); struct vtn_value *obj1_val = vtn_untyped_value(b, w[4]); struct vtn_value *obj2_val = vtn_untyped_value(b, w[5]); - const struct glsl_type *sel_type; + vtn_fail_if(obj1_val->type != res_val->type || + obj2_val->type != res_val->type, + "Object types must match the result type in OpSelect"); + + vtn_fail_if((cond_val->type->base_type != vtn_base_type_scalar && + cond_val->type->base_type != vtn_base_type_vector) || + !glsl_type_is_boolean(cond_val->type->type), + "OpSelect must have either a vector of booleans or " + "a boolean as Condition type"); + + vtn_fail_if(cond_val->type->base_type == vtn_base_type_vector && + (res_val->type->base_type != vtn_base_type_vector || + res_val->type->length != cond_val->type->length), + "When Condition type in OpSelect is a vector, the Result " + "type must be a vector of the same length"); + switch (res_val->type->base_type) { case vtn_base_type_scalar: - sel_type = glsl_bool_type(); - break; case vtn_base_type_vector: - sel_type = glsl_vector_type(GLSL_TYPE_BOOL, res_val->type->length); + case vtn_base_type_matrix: + case vtn_base_type_array: + case vtn_base_type_struct: + /* OK. */ break; case vtn_base_type_pointer: - /* We need to have actual storage for pointer types */ + /* We need to have actual storage for pointer types. */ vtn_fail_if(res_val->type->type == NULL, "Invalid pointer result type for OpSelect"); - sel_type = glsl_bool_type(); break; default: - vtn_fail("Result type of OpSelect must be a scalar, vector, or pointer"); - } - - if (unlikely(sel_val->type->type != sel_type)) { - if (sel_val->type->type == glsl_bool_type()) { - /* This case is illegal but some older versions of GLSLang produce - * it. The GLSLang issue was fixed on March 30, 2017: - * - * https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang/issues/809 - * - * Unfortunately, there are applications in the wild which are - * shipping with this bug so it isn't nice to fail on them so we - * throw a warning instead. It's not actually a problem for us as - * nir_builder will just splat the condition out which is most - * likely what the client wanted anyway. - */ - vtn_warn("Condition type of OpSelect must have the same number " - "of components as Result Type"); - } else { - vtn_fail("Condition type of OpSelect must be a scalar or vector " - "of Boolean type. It must have the same number of " - "components as Result Type"); - } + vtn_fail("Result type of OpSelect must be a scalar, composite, or pointer"); } - vtn_fail_if(obj1_val->type != res_val->type || - obj2_val->type != res_val->type, - "Object types must match the result type in OpSelect"); - struct vtn_type *res_type = vtn_value(b, w[1], vtn_value_type_type)->type; - struct vtn_ssa_value *ssa = vtn_create_ssa_value(b, res_type->type); - ssa->def = nir_bcsel(&b->nb, vtn_ssa_value(b, w[3])->def, - vtn_ssa_value(b, w[4])->def, - vtn_ssa_value(b, w[5])->def); + struct vtn_ssa_value *ssa = vtn_nir_select(b, + vtn_ssa_value(b, w[3]), vtn_ssa_value(b, w[4]), vtn_ssa_value(b, w[5])); + vtn_push_ssa(b, w[2], res_type, ssa); }