From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 22:58:20 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: i965: Handle BRW_OPCODE_DO on Gen6+ in brw_instruction_name().
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8bb156a261e866af2e0b4c59e2e29efd65bc0645;p=mesa.git

i965: Handle BRW_OPCODE_DO on Gen6+ in brw_instruction_name().

This became a problem after the recent disassembler changes.

Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
---

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp
index 0e33953f8cf..a23f14e8598 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp
@@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ brw_instruction_name(const struct brw_device_info *devinfo, enum opcode op)
 {
    switch (op) {
    case BRW_OPCODE_ILLEGAL ... BRW_OPCODE_NOP:
+      /* The DO instruction doesn't exist on Gen6+, but we use it to mark the
+       * start of a loop in the IR.
+       */
+      if (devinfo->gen >= 6 && op == BRW_OPCODE_DO)
+         return "do";
+
       assert(brw_opcode_desc(devinfo, op)->name);
       return brw_opcode_desc(devinfo, op)->name;
    case FS_OPCODE_FB_WRITE: