From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:00:33 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: Do not use CC_HAS_LONG_LONG
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8d5e08e10e9e5e9a8998057544c8c153779aa3f5;p=binutils-gdb.git

Do not use CC_HAS_LONG_LONG

ax.cc checks CC_HAS_LONG_LONG, but nothing defines this.  However,
PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG is checked in configure.  This patch removes the
former and keeps the latter.  This is PR remote/14976 (filed by me in
2012, lol).

I'm checking this in.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14976
---

diff --git a/gdbserver/ax.cc b/gdbserver/ax.cc
index f0c624c97df..d2d003377e0 100644
--- a/gdbserver/ax.cc
+++ b/gdbserver/ax.cc
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ ax_printf (CORE_ADDR fn, CORE_ADDR chan, const char *format,
 	    break;
 
 	  case long_long_arg:
-#if defined (CC_HAS_LONG_LONG) && defined (PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG)
+#if defined (PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG)
 	    {
 	      long long val = args[i];