From: Claudiu Zissulescu <claziss@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:59:34 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: [ARC] Pass along -mcode-density flag to the assembler.
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=928605936939d4364b5019b2bdda63612fbc4fdb;p=gcc.git

[ARC] Pass along -mcode-density flag to the assembler.

This change makes sure that if the driver is invoked with
"-mcode-density" flag, then the assembler will receive it too.

Note Claudiu Zissulescu:
This is an old patch of which I forgot to add the test.

testsuite/
2019-09-03  Sahahb Vahedi  <shahab@synopsys.com>

        * gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c: New test.
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index d9441cb0a2e..c08bc22b5a0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2020-01-28  Sahahb Vahedi  <shahab@synopsys.com>
+
+	* gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c: New test
+
 2020-01-28  Tobias Burnus  <tobias@codesourcery.com>
 
 	PR fortran/93464
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1ecf1a2ca29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* Produce code-dense instructions  and  the assembler must *
+ * be okay with it. An example would be:                    *
+ *                                                          *
+ * sub_s  r3, r1, r3                                        *
+ *                                                          *
+ * While generally for  _short instructions_ ,  it  is  not *
+ * allowed to have different registers  as  the  first  and *
+ * second operands, the code-dense mode allows it.          *
+ * This test is about the fact that if  "-mcode-density" is *
+ * passed to gcc driver as the flag,  "as"  must receive it *
+ * as well, else it is going to choke on such encodings.    */
+
+/* { dg-do assemble }                                       */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { clmcpu } } }                       */
+/* { dg-options "-mcpu=em_mini -mcode-density" }            */
+
+typedef long long uint64_t;
+
+uint64_t f1(void)
+{
+  return 1;
+}
+
+void f2(void)
+{
+  uint64_t start_us = 0;
+  while ((f1() - start_us) < 2);
+}
+
+/* This is a tricky check, because  it  hardcodes  register *
+ * numbers. Nevertheless, it is easier than coming up  with *
+ * a regular expression that the first two operands  should *
+ * not be the same.                                         */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "sub_s\\s+r3,r1,r3" } }      */