From: Iago Toral Quiroga Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:51:06 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Revert "nir/copy_propagate: do not copy-propagate MOV srcs with source modifiers" X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a29d922c1a19ecebb7c274f31248b00086cb4733;p=mesa.git Revert "nir/copy_propagate: do not copy-propagate MOV srcs with source modifiers" The change proposed in the review leads to piglit regressions because is_move() is used in other places and relies on the checks for source modifiers to be there. Revert this until we agree on a better solution. --- diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_opt_copy_propagate.c b/src/glsl/nir/nir_opt_copy_propagate.c index 2611069dd5c..7d8bdd7f2ca 100644 --- a/src/glsl/nir/nir_opt_copy_propagate.c +++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_opt_copy_propagate.c @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ static bool is_move(nir_alu_instr *instr) if (instr->dest.saturate) return false; + /* we handle modifiers in a separate pass */ + + if (instr->src[0].abs || instr->src[0].negate) + return false; + if (!instr->src[0].src.is_ssa) return false; @@ -60,13 +65,9 @@ static bool is_vec(nir_alu_instr *instr) } static bool -is_simple_move(nir_alu_instr *instr) +is_swizzleless_move(nir_alu_instr *instr) { if (is_move(instr)) { - /* We handle modifiers in a separate pass */ - if (instr->src[0].negate || instr->src[0].abs) - return false; - for (unsigned i = 0; i < 4; i++) { if (!((instr->dest.write_mask >> i) & 1)) break; @@ -80,10 +81,6 @@ is_simple_move(nir_alu_instr *instr) if (instr->src[i].swizzle[0] != i) return false; - /* We handle modifiers in a separate pass */ - if (instr->src[i].negate || instr->src[i].abs) - return false; - if (def == NULL) { def = instr->src[i].src.ssa; } else if (instr->src[i].src.ssa != def) { @@ -110,7 +107,7 @@ copy_prop_src(nir_src *src, nir_instr *parent_instr, nir_if *parent_if) return false; nir_alu_instr *alu_instr = nir_instr_as_alu(src_instr); - if (!is_simple_move(alu_instr)) + if (!is_swizzleless_move(alu_instr)) return false; /* Don't let copy propagation land us with a phi that has more