From: lkcl Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 21:50:47 +0000 (+0100) Subject: (no commit message) X-Git-Tag: opf_rfc_ls005_v1~1748 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a2d257cd351ae0bd33abf6d8c35fdbe48671e794;p=libreriscv.git --- diff --git a/openpower/sv/setvl.mdwn b/openpower/sv/setvl.mdwn index 87f8080e4..4c270feb1 100644 --- a/openpower/sv/setvl.mdwn +++ b/openpower/sv/setvl.mdwn @@ -172,8 +172,21 @@ is to be considered as if the "single element". Caveats exist for Registers used as Predicate Masks must *never* be altered by *any* instruction when Vertical-First is active. If more than the available -predicate registers are required (r3, r10, r30, CR Fields) then -a simple branch-conditional test should be used instead. +predicate registers are required (r3, r10, r30, CR Predicate Fields) then +because Vertical-First is not that different from executing standard +Scalar instructions, +a simple branch-conditional test should be used instead of predication, +exactly as would normally be done if SVP64 was not in use. + +These rules allow Hardware implementors to choose to +free up the connection +between registers used as predicates and registers used for standard +purposes: Hazards need not be created. + +Note that each of the registers may each be used as predicates, +or they may be used for standard normal purposes. If mixed for +both purposes when Vertical-First is active, the results of execution +is `UNDEFINED`. # Pseudocode @@ -189,7 +202,7 @@ a simple branch-conditional test should be used instead. if vf and not vs and not ms { // increment src/dest step mode // NOTE! this is in no way complete! predication is not included - // and neither is SUB-VL mode + // and neither is SUBVL mode srcstep = SPR[SV].srcstep dststep = SPR[SV].dststep VL = SPR[SV].VL @@ -206,7 +219,7 @@ a simple branch-conditional test should be used instead. // write CR? helps for doing Vertical loops, detects end // of Vector Elements - if Rc { + if Rc = 1 { // update CR to indicate that srcstep/dststep "rolled over" CR0.eq = rollover } @@ -253,7 +266,7 @@ a simple branch-conditional test should be used instead. regs[rt] = VL; } // write CR? - if Rc { + if Rc = 1 { // update CR from VL (not rt) CR0.eq = (VL == 0) ...