From: Andrey Miroshnikov Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:18:45 +0000 (+0000) Subject: LS bug process: Comment on branch names X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a2d3976da773e11a22fb1e44f4828678f44860ec;p=libreriscv.git LS bug process: Comment on branch names --- diff --git a/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn b/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn index 1cf0a848b..01bedad0d 100644 --- a/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn +++ b/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ an issue at all, it is to be set to either of the following: grant sub-task/s, and budget considered, *then* work can proceed in a separate branch. Only after fixes have been confirmed to keep the CI tests passing, can they be rebased (to keep commit history) into the master branch. + - *Note*: branch names **should not include personal info** such as names. + This is because others may require to use or work on the branch, and no + single developer owns a branch. This procedure adds a time delay between the issue discovery and start of work. This is important however because it allows for team members