From: Kaveh R. Ghazi Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 04:56:19 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * cris.h: Revert thinko in last patch. X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a338be441ce30765666b0c536059cb1edac8bb76;p=gcc.git * cris.h: Revert thinko in last patch. From-SVN: r47280 --- diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index e497f5c87b4..0217226f98c 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2001-11-22 Kaveh R. Ghazi + + * cris.h: Revert thinko in last patch. + 2001-11-23 Joseph S. Myers * ChangeLog.0, ChangeLog.2, ChangeLog.3, ChangeLog.4, ChangeLog, diff --git a/gcc/config/cris/cris.h b/gcc/config/cris/cris.h index b282dbdf885..2857788a968 100644 --- a/gcc/config/cris/cris.h +++ b/gcc/config/cris/cris.h @@ -856,6 +856,15 @@ enum reg_class {NO_REGS, ALL_REGS, LIM_REG_CLASSES}; TARGET_STACK_ALIGN and TARGET_ALIGN_BY_32. */ #define DWARF_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT -1 +/* If we would ever need an exact mapping between canonical register + number and dwarf frame register, we would either need to include all + registers in the gcc decription (with some marked fixed of course), or + an inverse mapping from dwarf register to gcc register. There is one + need in dwarf2out.c:expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes. Right now, I + don't see that we need exact correspondence between DWARF *frame* + registers and DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER, so map them onto GCC registers. */ +#define DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM(REG) (REG) + /* Node: Stack Checking */ /* (no definitions) FIXME: Check. */