From: Hristian Kirtchev Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 09:19:46 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [Ada] Suppress the expansion of ignored assertion pragmas X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a8531f7134a67d2c9dc74af667bcbc4d26de2520;p=gcc.git [Ada] Suppress the expansion of ignored assertion pragmas This patch suppresses the expansion of ignored assertion pragmas. 2018-06-11 Hristian Kirtchev gcc/ada/ * contracts.adb (Process_Body_Postconditions): Expand only checked postconditions. (Process_Contract_Cases_For): Expand only checked contract cases. (Process_Inherited_Preconditions): Ignored class-wide preconditions are partially expanded because some of their semantic checks are tied to the expansion. (Process_Preconditions_For): Expand only checked preconditions. (Process_Spec_Postconditions): Expand only checked preconditions. Ignored class-wide preconditions are partially expanded because some of their semantic checks are tied to the expansion. * exp_prag.adb (Expand_N_Pragma): Suppress the expansion of ignored assertion pragmas. * exp_util.adb (Add_Inherited_Invariants): Code clean up. * sem_util.adb (Propagate_Invariant_Attributes): Code clean up. gcc/testsuite/ * gnat.dg/assertion_policy1.adb, gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.adb, gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.ads: New testcase. From-SVN: r261430 --- diff --git a/gcc/ada/ChangeLog b/gcc/ada/ChangeLog index bb72af025e3..7ccdb01a316 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ada/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ +2018-06-11 Hristian Kirtchev + + * contracts.adb (Process_Body_Postconditions): Expand only checked + postconditions. + (Process_Contract_Cases_For): Expand only checked contract cases. + (Process_Inherited_Preconditions): Ignored class-wide preconditions are + partially expanded because some of their semantic checks are tied to + the expansion. + (Process_Preconditions_For): Expand only checked preconditions. + (Process_Spec_Postconditions): Expand only checked preconditions. + Ignored class-wide preconditions are partially expanded because some of + their semantic checks are tied to the expansion. + * exp_prag.adb (Expand_N_Pragma): Suppress the expansion of ignored + assertion pragmas. + * exp_util.adb (Add_Inherited_Invariants): Code clean up. + * sem_util.adb (Propagate_Invariant_Attributes): Code clean up. + 2018-06-11 Hristian Kirtchev * exp_ch9.adb, exp_unst.adb, inline.adb, libgnat/a-ciorma.adb, diff --git a/gcc/ada/contracts.adb b/gcc/ada/contracts.adb index 51cde068db1..104fd164574 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/contracts.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/contracts.adb @@ -2284,7 +2284,9 @@ package body Contracts is if Present (Items) then Prag := Contract_Test_Cases (Items); while Present (Prag) loop - if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Contract_Cases then + if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Contract_Cases + and then Is_Checked (Prag) + then Expand_Pragma_Contract_Cases (CCs => Prag, Subp_Id => Subp_Id, @@ -2342,7 +2344,9 @@ package body Contracts is if Present (Items) then Prag := Pre_Post_Conditions (Items); while Present (Prag) loop - if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Post_Nam then + if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Post_Nam + and then Is_Checked (Prag) + then Append_Enabled_Item (Item => Build_Pragma_Check_Equivalent (Prag), List => Stmts); @@ -2364,7 +2368,9 @@ package body Contracts is -- Note that non-matching pragmas are skipped if Nkind (Decl) = N_Pragma then - if Pragma_Name (Decl) = Post_Nam then + if Pragma_Name (Decl) = Post_Nam + and then Is_Checked (Decl) + then Append_Enabled_Item (Item => Build_Pragma_Check_Equivalent (Decl), List => Stmts); @@ -2394,6 +2400,7 @@ package body Contracts is procedure Process_Spec_Postconditions is Subps : constant Subprogram_List := Inherited_Subprograms (Spec_Id); + Item : Node_Id; Items : Node_Id; Prag : Node_Id; Subp_Id : Entity_Id; @@ -2406,7 +2413,9 @@ package body Contracts is if Present (Items) then Prag := Pre_Post_Conditions (Items); while Present (Prag) loop - if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Postcondition then + if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Postcondition + and then Is_Checked (Prag) + then Append_Enabled_Item (Item => Build_Pragma_Check_Equivalent (Prag), List => Stmts); @@ -2429,13 +2438,20 @@ package body Contracts is if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Postcondition and then Class_Present (Prag) then - Append_Enabled_Item - (Item => - Build_Pragma_Check_Equivalent - (Prag => Prag, - Subp_Id => Spec_Id, - Inher_Id => Subp_Id), - List => Stmts); + Item := + Build_Pragma_Check_Equivalent + (Prag => Prag, + Subp_Id => Spec_Id, + Inher_Id => Subp_Id); + + -- The pragma Check equivalent of the class-wide + -- postcondition is still created even though the + -- pragma may be ignored because the equivalent + -- performs semantic checks. + + if Is_Checked (Prag) then + Append_Enabled_Item (Item, Stmts); + end if; end if; Prag := Next_Pragma (Prag); @@ -2630,9 +2646,11 @@ package body Contracts is ---------------------- procedure Prepend_To_Decls (Item : Node_Id) is - Decls : List_Id := Declarations (Body_Decl); + Decls : List_Id; begin + Decls := Declarations (Body_Decl); + -- Ensure that the body has a declarative list if No (Decls) then @@ -2680,12 +2698,13 @@ package body Contracts is ------------------------------------- procedure Process_Inherited_Preconditions is - Subps : constant Subprogram_List := - Inherited_Subprograms (Spec_Id); - Check_Prag : Node_Id; - Items : Node_Id; - Prag : Node_Id; - Subp_Id : Entity_Id; + Subps : constant Subprogram_List := + Inherited_Subprograms (Spec_Id); + + Item : Node_Id; + Items : Node_Id; + Prag : Node_Id; + Subp_Id : Entity_Id; begin -- Process the contracts of all inherited subprograms, looking for @@ -2701,20 +2720,29 @@ package body Contracts is if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Precondition and then Class_Present (Prag) then - Check_Prag := + Item := Build_Pragma_Check_Equivalent (Prag => Prag, Subp_Id => Spec_Id, Inher_Id => Subp_Id); - -- The spec of an inherited subprogram already yielded - -- a class-wide precondition. Merge the existing - -- precondition with the current one using "or else". + -- The pragma Check equivalent of the class-wide + -- precondition is still created even though the + -- pragma may be ignored because the equivalent + -- performs semantic checks. - if Present (Class_Pre) then - Merge_Preconditions (Check_Prag, Class_Pre); - else - Class_Pre := Check_Prag; + if Is_Checked (Prag) then + + -- The spec of an inherited subprogram already + -- yielded a class-wide precondition. Merge the + -- existing precondition with the current one + -- using "or else". + + if Present (Class_Pre) then + Merge_Preconditions (Item, Class_Pre); + else + Class_Pre := Item; + end if; end if; end if; @@ -2736,7 +2764,8 @@ package body Contracts is ------------------------------- procedure Process_Preconditions_For (Subp_Id : Entity_Id) is - Items : constant Node_Id := Contract (Subp_Id); + Items : constant Node_Id := Contract (Subp_Id); + Decl : Node_Id; Prag : Node_Id; Subp_Decl : Node_Id; @@ -2747,7 +2776,9 @@ package body Contracts is if Present (Items) then Prag := Pre_Post_Conditions (Items); while Present (Prag) loop - if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Precondition then + if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Precondition + and then Is_Checked (Prag) + then Prepend_To_Decls_Or_Save (Prag); end if; @@ -2772,7 +2803,9 @@ package body Contracts is -- Note that non-matching pragmas are skipped if Nkind (Decl) = N_Pragma then - if Pragma_Name (Decl) = Name_Precondition then + if Pragma_Name (Decl) = Name_Precondition + and then Is_Checked (Decl) + then Prepend_To_Decls_Or_Save (Decl); end if; @@ -2908,20 +2941,18 @@ package body Contracts is elsif Is_Ignored_Ghost_Entity (Subp_Id) then return; - end if; -- Do not re-expand the same contract. This scenario occurs when a -- construct is rewritten into something else during its analysis -- (expression functions for instance). - if Has_Expanded_Contract (Subp_Id) then + elsif Has_Expanded_Contract (Subp_Id) then return; + end if; - -- Otherwise mark the subprogram + -- Prevent multiple expansion attempts of the same contract - else - Set_Has_Expanded_Contract (Subp_Id); - end if; + Set_Has_Expanded_Contract (Subp_Id); -- Ensure that the formal parameters are visible when expanding all -- contract items. diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_prag.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_prag.adb index 17277a91142..65cfe1fe339 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/exp_prag.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/exp_prag.adb @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ with Rtsfind; use Rtsfind; with Sem; use Sem; with Sem_Aux; use Sem_Aux; with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8; +with Sem_Prag; use Sem_Prag; with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util; with Sinfo; use Sinfo; with Sinput; use Sinput; @@ -167,11 +168,24 @@ package body Exp_Prag is Prag_Id : constant Pragma_Id := Get_Pragma_Id (Pname); begin - -- Rewrite pragma ignored by Ignore_Pragma to null statement, so that - -- the back end doesn't see it. The same goes for pragma - -- Default_Scalar_Storage_Order if the -gnatI switch was given. + -- Suppress the expansion of an ignored assertion pragma. Such a pragma + -- should not be transformed into a null statment because: + -- + -- * The pragma may be part of the rep item chain of a type, in which + -- case rewriting it will destroy the chain. + -- + -- * The analysis of the pragma may involve two parts (see routines + -- Analyze_xxx_In_Decl_Part). The second part of the analysis will + -- not happen if the pragma is rewritten. + + if Assertion_Expression_Pragma (Prag_Id) and then Is_Ignored (N) then + return; + + -- Rewrite the pragma into a null statement when it is ignored using + -- pragma Ignore_Pragma, or denotes Default_Scalar_Storage_Order and + -- compilation switch -gnatI is in effect. - if Should_Ignore_Pragma_Sem (N) + elsif Should_Ignore_Pragma_Sem (N) or else (Prag_Id = Pragma_Default_Scalar_Storage_Order and then Ignore_Rep_Clauses) then diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb index 7b49a7a29ba..3bed5080ffc 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb @@ -2307,7 +2307,7 @@ package body Exp_Util is Deriv_Typ := T; end if; - pragma Assert (Present (Deriv_Typ)); + pragma Assert (Present (Deriv_Typ)); -- Determine which rep item chain to use. Precedence is given to that -- of the parent type's partial view since it usually carries all the diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb index ec264094641..70c02da6ea1 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb @@ -23193,19 +23193,19 @@ package body Sem_Util is if Has_Inheritable_Invariants (From_Typ) and then not Has_Inheritable_Invariants (Typ) then - Set_Has_Inheritable_Invariants (Typ, True); + Set_Has_Inheritable_Invariants (Typ); end if; if Has_Inherited_Invariants (From_Typ) and then not Has_Inherited_Invariants (Typ) then - Set_Has_Inherited_Invariants (Typ, True); + Set_Has_Inherited_Invariants (Typ); end if; if Has_Own_Invariants (From_Typ) and then not Has_Own_Invariants (Typ) then - Set_Has_Own_Invariants (Typ, True); + Set_Has_Own_Invariants (Typ); end if; if Present (Full_IP) and then No (Invariant_Procedure (Typ)) then diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 7d088a1322c..b18759b389a 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2018-06-11 Hristian Kirtchev + + * gnat.dg/assertion_policy1.adb, gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.adb, + gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.ads: New testcase. + 2018-06-11 Ed Schonberg * gnat.dg/predicate1.adb: New testcase. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1.adb b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1.adb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1b773c40687 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1.adb @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +-- { dg-do run } +-- { dg-options "-gnata" } + +with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; +with Assertion_Policy1_Pkg; use Assertion_Policy1_Pkg; + +procedure Assertion_Policy1 is +begin + Proc (2, 1); + +exception + when others => + Put_Line ("ERROR: unexpected exception"); + raise; +end Assertion_Policy1; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.adb b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.adb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..90d31b50f28 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.adb @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; + +package body Assertion_Policy1_Pkg is + procedure Proc (Low : Integer; High : Integer) is + begin + Put_Line ("Proc"); + end Proc; +end Assertion_Policy1_Pkg; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.ads b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.ads new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..88b0056cbe2 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/assertion_policy1_pkg.ads @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +package Assertion_Policy1_Pkg is + pragma Assertion_Policy (Ignore); + + procedure Proc (Low : Integer; High : Integer) + with Pre => Low < High; +end Assertion_Policy1_Pkg;