From: Jeff Law Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 15:22:39 +0000 (-0600) Subject: tree-ssa-dom.c (optimize_stmt): Make this a method within the dom_opt_dom_walker... X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aa2a59fc606f242ab11e8fa89b71bba0d3fb25c7;p=gcc.git tree-ssa-dom.c (optimize_stmt): Make this a method within the dom_opt_dom_walker class with direct access to... * tree-ssa-dom.c (optimize_stmt): Make this a method within the dom_opt_dom_walker class with direct access to private members. Add comments. Call test_for_singularity. (dom_opt_dom_walker::before_dom_children): Corresponding changes. (dom_opt_dom_walker::after_dom_children): Do not lazily initialize m_dummy_cond anymore. (class dom_opt_dom_walker): Initialize m_dummy_cond member in the class ctor. (pass_dominator:execute): Build the dummy_cond here and pass it to the dom_opt_dom_walker ctor. (test_for_singularity): New function. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-simplify-1.c: New test. 2017-09-30 Paolo Carlini From-SVN: r253329 --- diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index d1c3e9fa409..93dcaedbb4a 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +2017-10-01 Jeff Law + + * tree-ssa-dom.c (optimize_stmt): Make this a method within the + dom_opt_dom_walker class with direct access to private members. + Add comments. Call test_for_singularity. + (dom_opt_dom_walker::before_dom_children): Corresponding changes. + (dom_opt_dom_walker::after_dom_children): Do not lazily initialize + m_dummy_cond anymore. + (class dom_opt_dom_walker): Initialize m_dummy_cond member in the + class ctor. + (pass_dominator:execute): Build the dummy_cond here and pass it + to the dom_opt_dom_walker ctor. + (test_for_singularity): New function. + 2017-09-30 Krister Walfridsson Maya Rashish diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 40f59343fe1..d12fbdd86a5 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2017-10-01 Jeff Law + + * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-simplify-1.c: New test. + 2017-10-01 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/61450 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-simplify-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-simplify-1.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23741b60f65 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-simplify-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -w -fdump-tree-dom2" } */ + +extern void frob (void); +extern void frob (void); + +void +rhs_to_tree (int x, int z) +{ + if (x >= 4) + frob (); + if (x >= 3) + frob (); +} + +/* The second conditional should change into a simple equality test. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "if \\(x_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\) == 3\\)" 1 "dom2"} } */ + diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c index d91766e902e..06be69a530c 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c @@ -103,9 +103,6 @@ struct opt_stats_d static struct opt_stats_d opt_stats; /* Local functions. */ -static edge optimize_stmt (basic_block, gimple_stmt_iterator, - class const_and_copies *, - class avail_exprs_stack *); static void record_equality (tree, tree, class const_and_copies *); static void record_equivalences_from_phis (basic_block); static void record_equivalences_from_incoming_edge (basic_block, @@ -572,11 +569,12 @@ class dom_opt_dom_walker : public dom_walker public: dom_opt_dom_walker (cdi_direction direction, class const_and_copies *const_and_copies, - class avail_exprs_stack *avail_exprs_stack) + class avail_exprs_stack *avail_exprs_stack, + gcond *dummy_cond) : dom_walker (direction, true), m_const_and_copies (const_and_copies), m_avail_exprs_stack (avail_exprs_stack), - m_dummy_cond (NULL) {} + m_dummy_cond (dummy_cond) { } virtual edge before_dom_children (basic_block); virtual void after_dom_children (basic_block); @@ -587,7 +585,14 @@ private: class const_and_copies *m_const_and_copies; class avail_exprs_stack *m_avail_exprs_stack; + /* Dummy condition to avoid creating lots of throw away statements. */ gcond *m_dummy_cond; + + /* Optimize a single statement within a basic block using the + various tables mantained by DOM. Returns the taken edge if + the statement is a conditional with a statically determined + value. */ + edge optimize_stmt (basic_block, gimple_stmt_iterator); }; /* Jump threading, redundancy elimination and const/copy propagation. @@ -684,10 +689,12 @@ pass_dominator::execute (function *fun) FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, fun) record_edge_info (bb); + gcond *dummy_cond = gimple_build_cond (NE_EXPR, integer_zero_node, + integer_zero_node, NULL, NULL); + /* Recursively walk the dominator tree optimizing statements. */ - dom_opt_dom_walker walker (CDI_DOMINATORS, - const_and_copies, - avail_exprs_stack); + dom_opt_dom_walker walker (CDI_DOMINATORS, const_and_copies, + avail_exprs_stack, dummy_cond); walker.walk (fun->cfg->x_entry_block_ptr); /* Look for blocks where we cleared EDGE_EXECUTABLE on an outgoing @@ -1348,8 +1355,7 @@ dom_opt_dom_walker::before_dom_children (basic_block bb) edge taken_edge = NULL; for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi)) - taken_edge - = optimize_stmt (bb, gsi, m_const_and_copies, m_avail_exprs_stack); + taken_edge = this->optimize_stmt (bb, gsi); /* Now prepare to process dominated blocks. */ record_edge_info (bb); @@ -1367,10 +1373,6 @@ dom_opt_dom_walker::before_dom_children (basic_block bb) void dom_opt_dom_walker::after_dom_children (basic_block bb) { - if (! m_dummy_cond) - m_dummy_cond = gimple_build_cond (NE_EXPR, integer_zero_node, - integer_zero_node, NULL, NULL); - thread_outgoing_edges (bb, m_dummy_cond, m_const_and_copies, m_avail_exprs_stack, simplify_stmt_for_jump_threading); @@ -1700,8 +1702,99 @@ cprop_into_stmt (gimple *stmt) } } -/* Optimize the statement in block BB pointed to by iterator SI - using equivalences from CONST_AND_COPIES and AVAIL_EXPRS_STACK. +/* If STMT contains a relational test, try to convert it into an + equality test if there is only a single value which can ever + make the test true. + + For example, if the expression hash table contains: + + TRUE = (i <= 1) + + And we have a test within statement of i >= 1, then we can safely + rewrite the test as i == 1 since there only a single value where + the test is true. + + This is similar to code in VRP. */ + +static void +test_for_singularity (gimple *stmt, gcond *dummy_cond, + avail_exprs_stack *avail_exprs_stack) +{ + /* We want to support gimple conditionals as well as assignments + where the RHS contains a conditional. */ + if (is_gimple_assign (stmt) || gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_COND) + { + enum tree_code code = ERROR_MARK; + tree lhs, rhs; + + /* Extract the condition of interest from both forms we support. */ + if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)) + { + code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt); + lhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt); + rhs = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt); + } + else if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_COND) + { + code = gimple_cond_code (as_a (stmt)); + lhs = gimple_cond_lhs (as_a (stmt)); + rhs = gimple_cond_rhs (as_a (stmt)); + } + + /* We're looking for a relational test using LE/GE. Also note we can + canonicalize LT/GT tests against constants into LE/GT tests. */ + if (code == LE_EXPR || code == GE_EXPR + || ((code == LT_EXPR || code == GT_EXPR) + && TREE_CODE (rhs) == INTEGER_CST)) + { + /* For LT_EXPR and GT_EXPR, canonicalize to LE_EXPR and GE_EXPR. */ + if (code == LT_EXPR) + rhs = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (rhs), + rhs, build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (rhs), 1)); + + if (code == GT_EXPR) + rhs = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (rhs), + rhs, build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (rhs), 1)); + + /* Determine the code we want to check for in the hash table. */ + enum tree_code test_code; + if (code == GE_EXPR || code == GT_EXPR) + test_code = LE_EXPR; + else + test_code = GE_EXPR; + + /* Update the dummy statement so we can query the hash tables. */ + gimple_cond_set_code (dummy_cond, test_code); + gimple_cond_set_lhs (dummy_cond, lhs); + gimple_cond_set_rhs (dummy_cond, rhs); + tree cached_lhs + = avail_exprs_stack->lookup_avail_expr (dummy_cond, false, false); + + /* If the lookup returned 1 (true), then the expression we + queried was in the hash table. As a result there is only + one value that makes the original conditional true. Update + STMT accordingly. */ + if (cached_lhs && integer_onep (cached_lhs)) + { + if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)) + { + gimple_assign_set_rhs_code (stmt, EQ_EXPR); + gimple_assign_set_rhs2 (stmt, rhs); + gimple_set_modified (stmt, true); + } + else + { + gimple_set_modified (stmt, true); + gimple_cond_set_code (as_a (stmt), EQ_EXPR); + gimple_cond_set_rhs (as_a (stmt), rhs); + gimple_set_modified (stmt, true); + } + } + } + } +} + +/* Optimize the statement in block BB pointed to by iterator SI. We try to perform some simplistic global redundancy elimination and constant propagation: @@ -1714,12 +1807,15 @@ cprop_into_stmt (gimple *stmt) 2- Constant values and copy assignments. This is used to do very simplistic constant and copy propagation. When a constant or copy assignment is found, we map the value on the RHS of the assignment to - the variable in the LHS in the CONST_AND_COPIES table. */ + the variable in the LHS in the CONST_AND_COPIES table. -static edge -optimize_stmt (basic_block bb, gimple_stmt_iterator si, - class const_and_copies *const_and_copies, - class avail_exprs_stack *avail_exprs_stack) + 3- Very simple redundant store elimination is performed. + + 4- We can simpify a condition to a constant or from a relational + condition to an equality condition. */ + +edge +dom_opt_dom_walker::optimize_stmt (basic_block bb, gimple_stmt_iterator si) { gimple *stmt, *old_stmt; bool may_optimize_p; @@ -1832,8 +1928,8 @@ optimize_stmt (basic_block bb, gimple_stmt_iterator si, } update_stmt_if_modified (stmt); - eliminate_redundant_computations (&si, const_and_copies, - avail_exprs_stack); + eliminate_redundant_computations (&si, m_const_and_copies, + m_avail_exprs_stack); stmt = gsi_stmt (si); /* Perform simple redundant store elimination. */ @@ -1855,8 +1951,8 @@ optimize_stmt (basic_block bb, gimple_stmt_iterator si, else new_stmt = gimple_build_assign (rhs, lhs); gimple_set_vuse (new_stmt, gimple_vuse (stmt)); - cached_lhs = avail_exprs_stack->lookup_avail_expr (new_stmt, false, - false); + cached_lhs = m_avail_exprs_stack->lookup_avail_expr (new_stmt, false, + false); if (cached_lhs && operand_equal_p (rhs, cached_lhs, 0)) { basic_block bb = gimple_bb (stmt); @@ -1871,11 +1967,16 @@ optimize_stmt (basic_block bb, gimple_stmt_iterator si, return retval; } } + + /* If this statement was not redundant, we may still be able to simplify + it, which may in turn allow other part of DOM or other passes to do + a better job. */ + test_for_singularity (stmt, m_dummy_cond, m_avail_exprs_stack); } /* Record any additional equivalences created by this statement. */ if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)) - record_equivalences_from_stmt (stmt, may_optimize_p, avail_exprs_stack); + record_equivalences_from_stmt (stmt, may_optimize_p, m_avail_exprs_stack); /* If STMT is a COND_EXPR or SWITCH_EXPR and it was modified, then we may know where it goes. */