From: Roland Pesch <pesch@cygnus>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 01:14:57 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: doc/gdbinv-s.m4.in: remove text on special procedures to continue after
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b01d070a454257ae80bb133c4779fbfd92936575;p=binutils-gdb.git

doc/gdbinv-s.m4.in: remove text on special procedures to continue after
                    explicit call to breakpoint() in serial stubs.
---

diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdbinv-s.m4.in b/gdb/doc/gdbinv-s.m4.in
index f2f4cef5560..f390745f295 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdbinv-s.m4.in
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdbinv-s.m4.in
@@ -128,33 +128,6 @@ _GDBN__ session will get control.
 Call @code{breakpoint} if none of these is true, or if you simply want
 to make certain your program stops at a predetermined point for the
 start of your debugging session.
-
-@quotation
-@emph{Warning:} when you set a breakpoint using this subroutine, it's a
-little harder than usual to restart your program afterwards---because if
-you simply @code{continue}, you will immediately run into the line of
-your program that sets the breakpoint!
-
-To get past this, adjust the program counter manually to get past the
-current instruction before issuing the @code{continue} command.  For example,
-
-@example
-(_GDBP__) p $pc = 4+$pc
-
-FIXME!!! Stu, I suspect I don't have this quite right.  
-         Please supply the right incantation...  presumably the
-         constant depends on instruction width, BTW?
-         Sample output would be nice too, so I don't have to make
-         up a ridiculous number.         
-
-Nothing simpler works, right?  Frinstance, an ignore count on the
-continue would just keep stopping at the same place too?
-
-Whatta bout $pc++ ---does GDB know the instruction width as a "type" size?
-
-(_GDBP__) continue
-@end example
-@end quotation
 @end table
 
 @node bootstrapping