From: Brian Paul Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:22:32 +0000 (-0700) Subject: st/mesa: rename attr variable in st_DrawTex() X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b92d48fb6ba775f5d321cade5e268bdbcca60cc3;p=mesa.git st/mesa: rename attr variable in st_DrawTex() Rename to 'tex_attr' to be a bit more clear. Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca --- diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_drawtex.c b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_drawtex.c index 6f57a2e241b..d07cdcc8de9 100644 --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_drawtex.c +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_drawtex.c @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ st_DrawTex(struct gl_context *ctx, GLfloat x, GLfloat y, GLfloat z, const GLfloat x0 = x, y0 = y, x1 = x + width, y1 = y + height; GLfloat *vbuf = NULL; - GLuint attr; + GLuint tex_attr; u_upload_alloc(st->uploader, 0, numAttribs * 4 * 4 * sizeof(GLfloat), 4, @@ -192,10 +192,10 @@ st_DrawTex(struct gl_context *ctx, GLfloat x, GLfloat y, GLfloat z, SET_ATTRIB(3, 1, c[0], c[1], c[2], c[3]); semantic_names[1] = TGSI_SEMANTIC_COLOR; semantic_indexes[1] = 0; - attr = 2; + tex_attr = 2; } else { - attr = 1; + tex_attr = 1; } /* texcoords */ @@ -212,17 +212,17 @@ st_DrawTex(struct gl_context *ctx, GLfloat x, GLfloat y, GLfloat z, const GLfloat t1 = (obj->CropRect[1] + obj->CropRect[3]) / ht; /*printf("crop texcoords: %g, %g .. %g, %g\n", s0, t0, s1, t1);*/ - SET_ATTRIB(0, attr, s0, t0, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* lower left */ - SET_ATTRIB(1, attr, s1, t0, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* lower right */ - SET_ATTRIB(2, attr, s1, t1, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* upper right */ - SET_ATTRIB(3, attr, s0, t1, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* upper left */ + SET_ATTRIB(0, tex_attr, s0, t0, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* lower left */ + SET_ATTRIB(1, tex_attr, s1, t0, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* lower right */ + SET_ATTRIB(2, tex_attr, s1, t1, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* upper right */ + SET_ATTRIB(3, tex_attr, s0, t1, 0.0f, 1.0f); /* upper left */ - semantic_names[attr] = st->needs_texcoord_semantic ? + semantic_names[tex_attr] = st->needs_texcoord_semantic ? TGSI_SEMANTIC_TEXCOORD : TGSI_SEMANTIC_GENERIC; /* XXX: should this use semantic index i instead of 0 ? */ - semantic_indexes[attr] = 0; + semantic_indexes[tex_attr] = 0; - attr++; + tex_attr++; } }