From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 20:56:07 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Treat ZERO_EXTEND like SIGN_EXTEND in emit_unop_insn
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bd8c4b14b51412daa1eaeeb11b9742cd395d5cda;p=gcc.git

Treat ZERO_EXTEND like SIGN_EXTEND in emit_unop_insn

From-SVN: r13262
---

diff --git a/gcc/optabs.c b/gcc/optabs.c
index d743fc8bd5e..22a9d2a720f 100644
--- a/gcc/optabs.c
+++ b/gcc/optabs.c
@@ -2388,9 +2388,10 @@ emit_unop_insn (icode, target, op0, code)
 
   op0 = protect_from_queue (op0, 0);
 
-  /* Sign extension from memory is often done specially on RISC
-     machines, so forcing into a register here can pessimize code.  */
-  if (flag_force_mem && code != SIGN_EXTEND)
+  /* Sign and zero extension from memory is often done specially on
+     RISC machines, so forcing into a register here can pessimize
+     code.  */
+  if (flag_force_mem && code != SIGN_EXTEND && code != ZERO_EXTEND)
     op0 = force_not_mem (op0);
 
   /* Now, if insn does not accept our operands, put them into pseudos.  */