From: Alexandre Oliva Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:30:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * config/tc-d10v.c (write_2_short): Don't skip dummy fixups, so X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c2c607a4885b1b9b36371f3873086de591abbb8c;p=binutils-gdb.git * config/tc-d10v.c (write_2_short): Don't skip dummy fixups, so that we can tell which operand refers to the insn put in the L container and mark it as such, so that the relocation type can be adjusted. --- diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog index d5d900c7911..b0e1b24eb51 100644 --- a/gas/ChangeLog +++ b/gas/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2001-12-04 Alexandre Oliva + + * config/tc-d10v.c (write_2_short): Don't skip dummy fixups, so + that we can tell which operand refers to the insn put in the L + container and mark it as such, so that the relocation type can be + adjusted. + 2001-12-04 Thiemo Seufer * config/tc-mips.c (mips_cpreturn_offset): Better comment. diff --git a/gas/config/tc-d10v.c b/gas/config/tc-d10v.c index 5238fb9613f..0dbf98a5a33 100644 --- a/gas/config/tc-d10v.c +++ b/gas/config/tc-d10v.c @@ -799,22 +799,14 @@ write_2_short (opcode1, insn1, opcode2, insn2, exec_type, fx) else if (opcode2->unit == MU) insn = FM00 | (insn2 << 15) | insn1; else - { - insn = FM00 | (insn1 << 15) | insn2; - /* Advance over dummy fixup since packed insn1 in L. */ - fx = fx->next; - } + insn = FM00 | (insn1 << 15) | insn2; } else if (opcode1->unit == IU) /* Reverse sequential with IU opcode1 on right and done first. */ insn = FM10 | (insn2 << 15) | insn1; else - { - /* Sequential with non-IU opcode1 on left and done first. */ - insn = FM01 | (insn1 << 15) | insn2; - /* Advance over dummy fixup since packed insn1 in L. */ - fx = fx->next; - } + /* Sequential with non-IU opcode1 on left and done first. */ + insn = FM01 | (insn1 << 15) | insn2; break; case PACK_PARALLEL: @@ -838,11 +830,7 @@ write_2_short (opcode1, insn1, opcode2, insn2, exec_type, fx) insn = FM00 | (insn2 << 15) | insn1; } else - { - insn = FM00 | (insn1 << 15) | insn2; - /* Advance over dummy fixup since packed insn1 in L. */ - fx = fx->next; - } + insn = FM00 | (insn1 << 15) | insn2; break; case PACK_LEFT_RIGHT: @@ -858,8 +846,6 @@ write_2_short (opcode1, insn1, opcode2, insn2, exec_type, fx) as_fatal (_("IU instruction may not be in the left container")); if (opcode1->exec_type & ALONE) as_warn (_("Instruction in R container is squashed by flow control instruction in L container.")); - /* Advance over dummy fixup. */ - fx = fx->next; break; case PACK_RIGHT_LEFT: @@ -875,8 +861,6 @@ write_2_short (opcode1, insn1, opcode2, insn2, exec_type, fx) as_fatal (_("MU instruction may not be in the right container")); if (opcode2->exec_type & ALONE) as_warn (_("Instruction in R container is squashed by flow control instruction in L container.")); - /* Advance over dummy fixup. */ - fx = fx->next; break; default: @@ -886,13 +870,8 @@ write_2_short (opcode1, insn1, opcode2, insn2, exec_type, fx) f = frag_more (4); number_to_chars_bigendian (f, insn, 4); - /* Process fixup chains. - Note that the packing code above advanced fx conditionally. - dlindsay@cygnus.com: There's something subtle going on here involving - _dummy_first_bfd_reloc_code_real. This is related to the - difference between BFD_RELOC_D10V_10_PCREL_R and _L, ie whether - a fixup is done in the L or R container. A bug in this code - can pass Plum Hall fine, yet still affect hand-written assembler. */ + /* Process fixup chains. fx refers to insn2 when j == 0, and to + insn1 when j == 1. Yes, it's reversed. */ for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) { @@ -904,7 +883,18 @@ write_2_short (opcode1, insn1, opcode2, insn2, exec_type, fx) if (fx->fix[i].size == 2) where += 2; - if ((fx->fix[i].reloc == BFD_RELOC_D10V_10_PCREL_R) && (j == 0)) + if (fx->fix[i].reloc == BFD_RELOC_D10V_10_PCREL_R + /* A BFD_RELOC_D10V_10_PCREL_R relocation applied to + the instruction in the L container has to be + adjusted to BDF_RELOC_D10V_10_PCREL_L. When + j==0, we're processing insn2's operands, so we + want to mark the operand if insn2 is *not* in the + R container. When j==1, we're processing insn1's + operands, so we want to mark the operand if insn2 + *is* in the R container. Note that, if two + instructions are identical, we're never going to + swap them, so the test is safe. */ + && j == ((insn & 0x7fff) == insn2)) fx->fix[i].operand |= 1024; if (fx->fix[i].reloc == BFD_RELOC_D10V_18)