From: Florent Kermarrec <florent@enjoy-digital.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:52:28 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: soc_sdram: use new LiteDRAMWishbone2Native and port.data_width
X-Git-Tag: 24jan2021_ls180~1642
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c64e44ef3fc3c05da236e23adb3ea4cf3c84426f;p=litex.git

soc_sdram: use new LiteDRAMWishbone2Native and port.data_width
---

diff --git a/litex/soc/integration/soc_sdram.py b/litex/soc/integration/soc_sdram.py
index 218ac86b..a1f2a63e 100644
--- a/litex/soc/integration/soc_sdram.py
+++ b/litex/soc/integration/soc_sdram.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ from litex.soc.interconnect.csr import AutoCSR
 from litex.soc.integration.soc_core import *
 
 from litedram.frontend import crossbar
-from litedram.frontend.bridge import LiteDRAMWishboneBridge
+from litedram.frontend.wishbone import LiteDRAMWishbone2Native
 from litedram import dfii, core
 
 
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ class SoCSDRAM(SoCCore):
 
         if self.l2_size:
             port = self.sdram.crossbar.get_port()
-            l2_cache = wishbone.Cache(self.l2_size//4, self._wb_sdram, wishbone.Interface(port.dw))
+            l2_cache = wishbone.Cache(self.l2_size//4, self._wb_sdram, wishbone.Interface(port.data_width))
             # XXX Vivado ->2015.1 workaround, Vivado is not able to map correctly our L2 cache.
             # Issue is reported to Xilinx and should be fixed in next releases (2015.2?).
             # Remove this workaround when fixed by Xilinx.
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ class SoCSDRAM(SoCCore):
                 self.submodules.l2_cache = FullMemoryWE()(l2_cache)
             else:
                 self.submodules.l2_cache = l2_cache
-            self.submodules.wishbone_bridge = LiteDRAMWishboneBridge(self.l2_cache.slave, port)
+            self.submodules.wishbone_bridge = LiteDRAMWishbone2Native(self.l2_cache.slave, port)
 
     def do_finalize(self):
         if not self.integrated_main_ram_size: