From: Charles Hannum <mycroft@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1992 04:15:46 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: *** empty log message ***
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c6e7f2fae020064048e6ab63b296524f199b46e7;p=gcc.git

*** empty log message ***

From-SVN: r1265
---

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h b/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h
index 5992413a3fc..bac364b8755 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ do { long value[2];							\
    have a precedent to follow with respect to DWARF register numbers
    for x86 FP registers, but the SDB on x86/svr4 is so completely
    broken with respect to FP registers that it is hardly worth thinking
-   of it as something to strive for compatability with.
+   of it as something to strive for compatibility with.
 
    The verison of x86/svr4 SDB I have at the moment does (partially)
    seem to believe that DWARF register number 11 is associated with