From: Andrew Cagney Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 01:01:56 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * regcache.c (register_valid): Revise comments refering to "Not X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c97dcfc7b8acc93a4be859f191ed37ac0c64efda;p=binutils-gdb.git * regcache.c (register_valid): Revise comments refering to "Not available" and "unavailable". * frame.c (frame_register_read): Ditto. * findvar.c (value_of_register): Ditto. --- diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 3900adb89cd..05f35b61ac8 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2002-05-14 Andrew Cagney + + * regcache.c (register_valid): Revise comments refering to "Not + available" and "unavailable". + * frame.c (frame_register_read): Ditto. + * findvar.c (value_of_register): Ditto. + 2002-05-15 Andrew Cagney * Makefile.in (remote_sim_h): Replace remote-sim_h. diff --git a/gdb/findvar.c b/gdb/findvar.c index 1faaa905113..831ae4bc1b0 100644 --- a/gdb/findvar.c +++ b/gdb/findvar.c @@ -308,6 +308,13 @@ value_of_register (int regnum, struct frame_info *frame) get_saved_register (raw_buffer, &optim, &addr, frame, regnum, &lval); + /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-15: This test is just bogus. + + It indicates that the target failed to supply a value for a + register because it was "not available" at this time. Problem + is, the target still has the register and so get saved_register() + may be returning a value saved on the stack. */ + if (register_cached (regnum) < 0) return NULL; /* register value not available */ diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c index 27531501d59..24cd9071437 100644 --- a/gdb/frame.c +++ b/gdb/frame.c @@ -157,10 +157,13 @@ frame_register_read (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, void *myaddr) get_saved_register (myaddr, &optim, (CORE_ADDR *) NULL, frame, regnum, (enum lval_type *) NULL); - /* FIXME: cagney/2002-04-10: This test is just bogus. It is no - indication of the validity of the register. The value could - easily be found (on the stack) even though the corresponding - register isn't available. */ + /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-15: This test, is just bogus. + + It indicates that the target failed to supply a value for a + register because it was "not available" at this time. Problem + is, the target still has the register and so get saved_register() + may be returning a value saved on the stack. */ + if (register_cached (regnum) < 0) return 0; /* register value not available */ diff --git a/gdb/regcache.c b/gdb/regcache.c index bbad17d59c0..11ed8c4f70d 100644 --- a/gdb/regcache.c +++ b/gdb/regcache.c @@ -45,7 +45,13 @@ char *registers; /* REGISTER_VALID is 0 if the register needs to be fetched, 1 if it has been fetched, and -1 if the register value was not available. - "Not available" means don't try to fetch it again. */ + + "Not available" indicates that the target is not not able to supply + the register at this state. The register may become available at a + later time (after the next resume). This often occures when GDB is + manipulating a target that contains only a snapshot of the entire + system being debugged - some of the registers in such a system may + not have been saved. */ signed char *register_valid;