From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:03:16 +0000 (+0200) Subject: package/libselinux: fix build with musl X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cac3cf8f9c36140eb0f5cd76665c1fdb0b47676c;p=buildroot.git package/libselinux: fix build with musl musl does not define glibcisms, so we are missing some macros. Define what we need in case the macro is missing. We're using a dumb implementation, which is rather slow, to avoid copying from glibc, to avoid propagating the LGPL to libselinux, which is Public Domain. Fixes a bunch of autobuild failures: http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/d4d/d4d209719d1ce5219f84719ad72fcb6a0c684007/ http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/1a6/1a65cc3d2c23a3c17c605788be62dbd18cbdaf76/ http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/0d0/0d0e4713833182d0f634b9b39b2c56f2bc0adcac/ ... Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" Cc: Clayton Shotwell Reviewed-by: Clayton Shotwell Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- diff --git a/package/libselinux/0002-fix-musl-build.patch b/package/libselinux/0002-fix-musl-build.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7af3a3c36f --- /dev/null +++ b/package/libselinux/0002-fix-musl-build.patch @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +fix undefined macros in musl + +musl does not define glibc-specific macros, so use a simple version of +the macro when it is not defined. + +This is very inefficient, however, but copying the code from glibc is +not really possible because it is LGPL while libselinux in Public +Domain, and we want to avoid license propagation, so this macro is +completely written from scratch, and non-optimal. + +Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" + +diff -durN libselinux-2.1.13.orig/src/booleans.c libselinux-2.1.13/src/booleans.c +--- libselinux-2.1.13.orig/src/booleans.c 2013-02-06 02:43:22.000000000 +0100 ++++ libselinux-2.1.13/src/booleans.c 2015-07-26 20:40:41.311801914 +0200 +@@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ + goto bad; + } + ++/* Simple (but inefficient) version of _D_ALLOC_NAMLEN when ++ * building with a C library that misses it (e.g. musl). ++ * Note: glibc does a strlen on (d)->d_name, so assume it is safe. ++ */ ++#ifndef _D_ALLOC_NAMLEN ++#define _D_ALLOC_NAMLEN(d) (strlen((d)->d_name)+1) ++#endif ++ + for (i = 0; i < *len; i++) { + n[i] = (char *)malloc(_D_ALLOC_NAMLEN(namelist[i])); + if (!n[i]) {