From: Eric Botcazou Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 15:35:02 +0000 (+0200) Subject: [Ada] Fix small fallout of previous change for Analyze_Selected_Component X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ce716aaaa3efb464af4caa16d8f75814c401b593;p=gcc.git [Ada] Fix small fallout of previous change for Analyze_Selected_Component 2020-06-19 Eric Botcazou gcc/ada/ * sem_ch3.adb (Is_Visible_Component): Reason only on the private status of the original type in an instance body. --- diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch3.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch3.adb index e33e3b35912..9e60d75152d 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch3.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch3.adb @@ -18864,7 +18864,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch3 is -- a component in a sibling package that is inherited from a visible -- component of a type in an ancestor package; the component in the -- sibling package should not be visible even though the component it - -- inherited from is visible). This does not apply however in the case + -- inherited from is visible), but instance bodies are not subject to + -- this second case since they have the Has_Private_View mechanism to + -- ensure proper visibility. This does not apply however in the case -- where the scope of the type is a private child unit, or when the -- parent comes from a local package in which the ancestor is currently -- visible. The latter suppression of visibility is needed for cases @@ -18874,7 +18876,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch3 is or else (not Is_Private_Descendant (Type_Scope) and then not In_Open_Scopes (Type_Scope) - and then Has_Private_Declaration (Original_Type)) + and then Has_Private_Declaration (Original_Type) + and then not In_Instance_Body) then -- If the type derives from an entity in a formal package, there -- are no additional visible components.