From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:59:44 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: libstdc++: Remove redundant clock conversions in atomic waits
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dfc537e554afa98b42a4b203ffd08c0eddba746e;p=gcc.git

libstdc++: Remove redundant clock conversions in atomic waits

For the case where a timeout is specified using the system_clock we
perform a conversion to the preferred clock (which is either
steady_clock or system_clock itself), wait using __cond_wait_until_impl,
and then check the time by that clock again to see if it was reached.
This is entirely redundant, as we can just call __cond_wait_until_impl
directly. It will wait using the specified clock, and there's no need to
check the time twice. For the no_timeout case this removes two
unnecessary calls to the clock's now() function, and for the timeout
case it removes three calls.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

	* include/bits/atomic_timed_wait.h (__cond_wait_until): Do not
	perform redundant conversions to the same clock.
---

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_timed_wait.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_timed_wait.h
index 9e44114dd5b..1c91c858ce7 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_timed_wait.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_timed_wait.h
@@ -166,24 +166,32 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       __cond_wait_until(__condvar& __cv, mutex& __mx,
 	  const chrono::time_point<_Clock, _Duration>& __atime)
       {
-#ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_PTHREAD_COND_CLOCKWAIT
-	using __clock_t = chrono::steady_clock;
-#else
+#ifndef _GLIBCXX_USE_PTHREAD_COND_CLOCKWAIT
 	using __clock_t = chrono::system_clock;
+#else
+	using __clock_t = chrono::steady_clock;
+	if constexpr (is_same_v<_Clock, chrono::steady_clock>)
+	  return __detail::__cond_wait_until_impl(__cv, __mx, __atime);
+	else
 #endif
-	const typename _Clock::time_point __c_entry = _Clock::now();
-	const __clock_t::time_point __s_entry = __clock_t::now();
-	const auto __delta = __atime - __c_entry;
-	const auto __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta;
-	if (__detail::__cond_wait_until_impl(__cv, __mx, __s_atime)
-	    == __atomic_wait_status::no_timeout)
-	  return __atomic_wait_status::no_timeout;
-	// We got a timeout when measured against __clock_t but
-	// we need to check against the caller-supplied clock
-	// to tell whether we should return a timeout.
-	if (_Clock::now() < __atime)
-	  return __atomic_wait_status::no_timeout;
-	return __atomic_wait_status::timeout;
+	if constexpr (is_same_v<_Clock, chrono::system_clock>)
+	  return __detail::__cond_wait_until_impl(__cv, __mx, __atime);
+	else
+	  {
+	    const typename _Clock::time_point __c_entry = _Clock::now();
+	    const __clock_t::time_point __s_entry = __clock_t::now();
+	    const auto __delta = __atime - __c_entry;
+	    const auto __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta;
+	    if (__detail::__cond_wait_until_impl(__cv, __mx, __s_atime)
+		== __atomic_wait_status::no_timeout)
+	      return __atomic_wait_status::no_timeout;
+	    // We got a timeout when measured against __clock_t but
+	    // we need to check against the caller-supplied clock
+	    // to tell whether we should return a timeout.
+	    if (_Clock::now() < __atime)
+	      return __atomic_wait_status::no_timeout;
+	    return __atomic_wait_status::timeout;
+	  }
       }
 #endif // FUTEX