From: Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 23:07:43 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: fix
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e389f80098efb019e8d166338894249770f26e6e;p=gcc.git

fix

From-SVN: r23375
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C
index 8690d11a038..7f8647226c8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
-// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-*
+// All the pointer_to_binary_function cases used to fail because g++
+// couldn't handle converting an overloaded function to a class type.
+// The first one should still fail because it requires an implicit conversion
+// to pointer_to_binary_function, which has an `explicit' constructor.
 
 #include <vector.h>
 #include <algo.h>
@@ -13,7 +16,7 @@ public :
 template <class T >
 inline bool compare(const Expr<T> a, const Expr<T> b){ return true; };
 
-void main()
+int main()
 {
   vector<int>	a(3);
   sort( a.begin(), a.end(),
@@ -21,7 +24,7 @@ void main()
   sort( a.begin(), a.end(), compare<int> );
   sort<vector<int>::iterator,
        pointer_to_binary_function<const Expr<int>, const Expr<int>, bool> >
-    ( a.begin(), a.end(), compare );
+    ( a.begin(), a.end(), compare ); // ERROR - constructor is explicit
   sort( a.begin(), a.end(),
 	ptr_fun<const Expr<int>, const Expr<int>, bool> (compare) );
   sort( a.begin(), a.end(),