From: Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:24:12 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: dr 1188 comment
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e618eb626c028f1b4d3fbed9926f906bd20aca98;p=gcc.git

dr 1188 comment

From-SVN: r175405
---

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 6622de62985..f4aa350cb7c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -6357,7 +6357,7 @@ cxx_eval_component_reference (const constexpr_call *call, tree t,
     }
   if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (whole)) == UNION_TYPE)
     {
-      /* FIXME Mike Miller wants this to be OK.  */
+      /* DR 1188 says we don't have to deal with this.  */
       if (!allow_non_constant)
 	error ("accessing %qD member instead of initialized %qD member in "
 	       "constant expression", part, CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (whole, 0)->index);
@@ -6881,7 +6881,7 @@ cxx_eval_indirect_ref (const constexpr_call *call, tree t,
 	{
 	  gcc_assert (!same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
 		      (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (sub)), TREE_TYPE (t)));
-	  /* FIXME Mike Miller wants this to be OK.  */
+	  /* DR 1188 says we don't have to deal with this.  */
 	  if (!allow_non_constant)
 	    error ("accessing value of %qE through a %qT glvalue in a "
 		   "constant expression", build_fold_indirect_ref (sub),
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-union.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-union.C
index b4613058ee0..3c7a7f38ec8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-union.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-union.C
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // Test that we don't have to deal with type punning
-// FIXME Mike Miller thinks it should work
+// DR 1188 says this is ill-formed
 // { dg-options -std=c++0x }
 
 union U