From: programmerjake@6415f89267377da4199b62e82acfa94913226af1 <programmerjake@web>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 06:56:28 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: mv-swizzle could fuse with preceding instruction too
X-Git-Tag: convert-csv-opcode-to-binary~4222
X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eb576b3eb697c6e6645fce2247b02434f750bde6;p=libreriscv.git

mv-swizzle could fuse with preceding instruction too
---

diff --git a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst
index f174f7b08..f0ed748f1 100644
--- a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst
+++ b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst
@@ -53,5 +53,5 @@ question: do we need a swizzle MV.X as well?
 macro-op fusion
 ===============
 
-there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction.
+there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction and/or preceding instruction.
 <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/2019-August/002486.html>