From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 21:21:34 +0000 (+0000) Subject: If GDB says it can't find the struct the function returned, report X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f2e54a8073059ba401fb1ede1c3efeb5547abbec;p=binutils-gdb.git If GDB says it can't find the struct the function returned, report those tests as `unsupported'. * gdb.base/structs.exp (call_struct_func): New function. (do_function_calls): Use call_struct_func to call the functions returning structs. --- diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index 7ca720570f0..b249cb8c2a0 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@ 2001-12-07 Jim Blandy + If GDB says it can't find the struct the function returned, report + those tests as `unsupported'. + * gdb.base/structs.exp (call_struct_func): New function. + (do_function_calls): Use call_struct_func to call the functions + returning structs. + * gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: The stabs generated by GCC don't tell us whether functions are prototyped or not, so we can't possibly pass arguments to t_float_values2 properly. diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp index 2d6de38dec9..75d65dc0a5e 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp @@ -54,6 +54,32 @@ if [istarget "a29k-*-udi"] then { continue } + +# Call FUNC with no arguments, and expect to see the regexp RESULT in +# the output. If we get back the error message "Function return value +# unknown", call that an unsupported test; on some architectures, it's +# impossible to find structs returned by value reliably. +proc call_struct_func { func result } { + global gdb_prompt + + set command "p ${func}()" + send_gdb "${command}\n" + gdb_expect { + -re "$result\[\r\n\]+$gdb_prompt $" { + pass "$command" + } + -re "Function return value unknown.\[\r\n\]+$gdb_prompt $" { + unsupported "$command" + } + -re "$gdb_prompt $" { + fail "$command" + } + timeout { + fail "$command (timeout)" + } + } +} + # FIXME: Before calling this proc, we should probably verify that # we can call inferior functions and get a valid integral value # returned. @@ -67,19 +93,19 @@ proc do_function_calls {} { global gdb_prompt # First, call the "fun" functions and examine the value they return. - gdb_test "p fun1()" " = {a = 49 '1'}" - gdb_test "p fun2()" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b'}" - gdb_test "p fun3()" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C'}" - gdb_test "p fun4()" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4'}" - gdb_test "p fun5()" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b', c = 99 'c', d = 100 'd', e = 101 'e'}" - gdb_test "p fun6()" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C', d = 68 'D', e = 69 'E', f = 70 'F'}" - gdb_test "p fun7()" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4', e = 53 '5', f = 54 '6', g = 55 '7'}" - gdb_test "p fun8()" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4', e = 53 '5', f = 54 '6', g = 55 '7', h = 56 '8'}" - gdb_test "p fun9()" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b', c = 99 'c', d = 100 'd', e = 101 'e', f = 102 'f', g = 103 'g', h = 104 'h', i = 105 'i'}" - gdb_test "p fun10()" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C', d = 68 'D', e = 69 'E', f = 70 'F', g = 71 'G', h = 72 'H', i = 73 'I', j = 74 'J'}" - gdb_test "p fun11()" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4', e = 53 '5', f = 54 '6', g = 55 '7', h = 56 '8', i = 57 '9', j = 65 'A', k = 66 'B'}" - gdb_test "p fun12()" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C', d = 68 'D', e = 69 'E', f = 70 'F', g = 71 'G', h = 72 'H', i = 73 'I', j = 74 'J', k = 75 'K', l = 76 'L'}" - gdb_test "p fun16()" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b', c = 99 'c', d = 100 'd', e = 101 'e', f = 102 'f', g = 103 'g', h = 104 'h', i = 105 'i', j = 106 'j', k = 107 'k', l = 108 'l', m = 109 'm', n = 110 'n', o = 111 'o', p = 112 'p'}" + call_struct_func "fun1" " = {a = 49 '1'}" + call_struct_func "fun2" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b'}" + call_struct_func "fun3" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C'}" + call_struct_func "fun4" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4'}" + call_struct_func "fun5" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b', c = 99 'c', d = 100 'd', e = 101 'e'}" + call_struct_func "fun6" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C', d = 68 'D', e = 69 'E', f = 70 'F'}" + call_struct_func "fun7" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4', e = 53 '5', f = 54 '6', g = 55 '7'}" + call_struct_func "fun8" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4', e = 53 '5', f = 54 '6', g = 55 '7', h = 56 '8'}" + call_struct_func "fun9" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b', c = 99 'c', d = 100 'd', e = 101 'e', f = 102 'f', g = 103 'g', h = 104 'h', i = 105 'i'}" + call_struct_func "fun10" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C', d = 68 'D', e = 69 'E', f = 70 'F', g = 71 'G', h = 72 'H', i = 73 'I', j = 74 'J'}" + call_struct_func "fun11" " = {a = 49 '1', b = 50 '2', c = 51 '3', d = 52 '4', e = 53 '5', f = 54 '6', g = 55 '7', h = 56 '8', i = 57 '9', j = 65 'A', k = 66 'B'}" + call_struct_func "fun12" " = {a = 65 'A', b = 66 'B', c = 67 'C', d = 68 'D', e = 69 'E', f = 70 'F', g = 71 'G', h = 72 'H', i = 73 'I', j = 74 'J', k = 75 'K', l = 76 'L'}" + call_struct_func "fun16" " = {a = 97 'a', b = 98 'b', c = 99 'c', d = 100 'd', e = 101 'e', f = 102 'f', g = 103 'g', h = 104 'h', i = 105 'i', j = 106 'j', k = 107 'k', l = 108 'l', m = 109 'm', n = 110 'n', o = 111 'o', p = 112 'p'}" # Now call the Fun functions to set the L* variables. This # tests that gdb properly passes structures to functions.